Ingrid Bethus

2.0k total citations · 1 hit paper
17 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Ingrid Bethus is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience and Physiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Ingrid Bethus has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 9 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 4 papers in Physiology. Recurrent topics in Ingrid Bethus's work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (12 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (8 papers) and Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (4 papers). Ingrid Bethus is often cited by papers focused on Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (12 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (8 papers) and Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (4 papers). Ingrid Bethus collaborates with scholars based in France, Malta and United Kingdom. Ingrid Bethus's co-authors include Dorothy Tse, Richard Morris, Rosamund F. Langston, Emma R. Wood, Menno P. Witter, Patrick A. Spooner, Masaki Kakeyama, Glyn Goodall, Hélène Marie and Richard Muscat and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Journal of Neuroscience and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Ingrid Bethus

17 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Hit Papers

Schemas and Memory Consolidation 2007 2026 2013 2019 2007 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ingrid Bethus France 12 1.0k 661 146 136 127 17 1.4k
Melanie J. Sekeres Canada 19 1.1k 1.1× 817 1.2× 195 1.3× 203 1.5× 237 1.9× 34 2.0k
Alexander Easton United Kingdom 25 1.2k 1.2× 685 1.0× 98 0.7× 255 1.9× 105 0.8× 62 1.6k
Patrick A. Spooner United Kingdom 9 1.3k 1.3× 926 1.4× 95 0.7× 206 1.5× 147 1.2× 15 1.6k
Magdalena Sauvage Germany 24 1.1k 1.1× 873 1.3× 322 2.2× 197 1.4× 142 1.1× 45 1.7k
Sandra N. Moses Canada 24 1.4k 1.4× 467 0.7× 116 0.8× 86 0.6× 116 0.9× 37 1.7k
Rosemary A. Cowell United States 16 1.2k 1.2× 652 1.0× 123 0.8× 107 0.8× 98 0.8× 37 1.6k
James A. Ainge United Kingdom 20 1.4k 1.4× 1.3k 1.9× 155 1.1× 249 1.8× 240 1.9× 36 2.0k
Christopher J. MacDonald United States 16 1.6k 1.6× 863 1.3× 98 0.7× 76 0.6× 127 1.0× 21 1.9k
Rosamund F. Langston United Kingdom 13 1.9k 1.9× 1.3k 2.0× 179 1.2× 177 1.3× 248 2.0× 20 2.4k
Kara L. Agster United States 18 1.7k 1.7× 1.3k 1.9× 218 1.5× 186 1.4× 166 1.3× 20 2.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Ingrid Bethus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ingrid Bethus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ingrid Bethus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ingrid Bethus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ingrid Bethus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ingrid Bethus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ingrid Bethus. The network helps show where Ingrid Bethus may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ingrid Bethus

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ingrid Bethus. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ingrid Bethus based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ingrid Bethus. Ingrid Bethus is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Reynaud-Bouret, Patricia, et al.. (2024). Coding Dynamics of the Striatal Networks During Learning. eNeuro. 11(10). ENEURO.0436–23.2024. 1 indexed citations
2.
Reynaud-Bouret, Patricia, et al.. (2023). Strategy inference during learning via cognitive activity-based credit assignment models. Scientific Reports. 13(1). 9408–9408. 2 indexed citations
3.
Guyon, Alice, et al.. (2023). Episodic Memory formation: A review of complex Hippocampus input pathways. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry. 126. 110757–110757. 23 indexed citations
4.
Fabre, Roxane, Thomas Desmidt, Jérôme Golebiowski, et al.. (2023). Different Trajectories of Apathy and Depression Among Subjective Cognitive Impairment Individuals with or without Conversion to Dementia: Results from the Memento Cohort in France. Journal of Alzheimer s Disease. 95(2). 415–426. 1 indexed citations
5.
Duprat, Fabrice, Paula A. Pousinha, Alexandre Loucif, et al.. (2019). A two-hit story: Seizures and genetic mutation interaction sets phenotype severity in SCN1A epilepsies. Neurobiology of Disease. 125. 31–44. 45 indexed citations
6.
Pousinha, Paula A., Xavier Mouska, Daniela Bianchi, et al.. (2019). The Amyloid Precursor Protein C-Terminal Domain Alters CA1 Neuron Firing, Modifying Hippocampus Oscillations and Impairing Spatial Memory Encoding. Cell Reports. 29(2). 317–331.e5. 27 indexed citations
7.
Kootar, Scherazad, Xavier Mouska, Thomas Lorivel, et al.. (2018). Identification of an acute functional cross-talk between amyloid-β and glucocorticoid receptors at hippocampal excitatory synapses. Neurobiology of Disease. 118. 117–128. 7 indexed citations
8.
Ruiz-Reig, Nuria, et al.. (2018). Developmental Requirement of Homeoprotein Otx2 for Specific Habenulo-Interpeduncular Subcircuits. Journal of Neuroscience. 39(6). 1005–1019. 12 indexed citations
9.
Pousinha, Paula A., Xavier Mouska, Carole Gwizdek, et al.. (2017). Physiological and pathophysiological control of synaptic GluN2B-NMDA receptors by the C-terminal domain of amyloid precursor protein. eLife. 6. 28 indexed citations
10.
Lanté, Fabien, Magda Chafaï, Xavier Mouska, et al.. (2015). Subchronic Glucocorticoid Receptor Inhibition Rescues Early Episodic Memory and Synaptic Plasticity Deficits in a Mouse Model of Alzheimer’s Disease. Neuropsychopharmacology. 40(7). 1772–1781. 59 indexed citations
11.
Bethus, Ingrid, Dorothy Tse, & Richard Morris. (2010). Dopamine and Memory: Modulation of the Persistence of Memory for Novel Hippocampal NMDA Receptor-Dependent Paired Associates. Journal of Neuroscience. 30(5). 1610–1618. 213 indexed citations
12.
Tse, Dorothy, Rosamund F. Langston, Ingrid Bethus, et al.. (2007). Does assimilation into schemas involve systems or cellular consolidation? It’s not just time. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory. 89(4). 361–365. 15 indexed citations
13.
Tse, Dorothy, Rosamund F. Langston, Masaki Kakeyama, et al.. (2007). Schemas and Memory Consolidation. Science. 316(5821). 76–82. 848 indexed citations breakdown →
14.
Bethus, Ingrid, Richard Muscat, & Glyn Goodall. (2006). Dopamine manipulations limited to preexposure are sufficient to modulate latent inhibition.. Behavioral Neuroscience. 120(3). 554–562. 8 indexed citations
15.
Bethus, Ingrid, Valérie Lemaire, Marie Lhomme, & Glyn Goodall. (2004). Does prenatal stress affect latent inhibition? It depends on the gender. Behavioural Brain Research. 158(2). 331–338. 31 indexed citations
16.
Bethus, Ingrid, Luis Stinus, & Glyn Goodall. (2003). Chronic interferon-α potentiates latent inhibition in rats. Behavioural Brain Research. 144(1-2). 167–174. 13 indexed citations
17.
Bethus, Ingrid, et al.. (2002). Antidepressant reversal of interferon-α-induced anhedonia. Physiology & Behavior. 75(5). 765–772. 46 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026