Inge van Meurs
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Child Abuse and Trauma
- Family and Disability Support Research
-
- Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Papers in
-
- Cognitive Abilities and Testing 5
- Mental Health Research Topics 2
-
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development 7
- Journals
- Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (3 papers)European Journal of Criminology (1 paper)Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (1 paper)European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (1 paper)Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- Netherlands
In The Last Decade
Inge van Meurs
8 papers receiving 463 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Clinical Psychology 385
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 62
- Speech and Hearing 32
- Social Psychology 93
- Psychiatry and Mental health 59
Countries citing papers authored by Inge van Meurs
This map shows the geographic impact of Inge van Meurs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inge van Meurs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inge van Meurs more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Inge van Meurs
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inge van Meurs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inge van Meurs. The network helps show where Inge van Meurs may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Inge van Meurs, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 5 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 68 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 69 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 218 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 87 | |
| 7 | Intergenerational transmission of child problem behavior | 2009 | 3 |
| 8 | 2009 | 30 |
About Inge van Meurs
Inge van Meurs is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Management of Technology and Innovation and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 8 papers that have together received 484 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (7 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (5 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (2 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (2 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (1 paper), Organizational Management and Leadership (1 paper) and Early Childhood Education and Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (385 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (62 citations), Speech and Hearing (32 citations), Social Psychology (93 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (59 citations). Inge van Meurs has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Joni Reef, Frank C. Verhulst, Jan van der Ende and Sofia Diamantopoulou. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, European Journal of Criminology, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry and Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.