Inge M Thijs

1.1k citations
31 papers · 591 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Inge M Thijs

30 papers receiving 579 citations

Peers

Inge M Thijs
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 102
  • Endocrinology 46
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 55
  • Food Science 54
  • Molecular Medicine 13
Replace C. Boissinot with:
C. Boissinot France
Barbara Królak‐Olejnik Poland
Kristin Pullen United States
Sara H. Browne United States
John T. Fitter Australia
R Toaff Israel
Keith A. Martinez United States
Isoken Olomu United States
Massimo Bisceglia Italy
Tuong M. Ho Vietnam
Inge M Thijs relative to C. Boissinot France C. Boissinot's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×30×43×
C. Boissinot · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Inge M Thijs

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Inge M Thijs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inge M Thijs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inge M Thijs more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Inge M Thijs

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inge M Thijs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inge M Thijs. The network helps show where Inge M Thijs may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Inge M Thijs, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Inge M Thijs Line = papers co-authored together Inge M Thijs links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200762
2 201845
3 201742
4 200942
5 201841
6 201740
7 201740
8 201039
9 201833
10 200630
11 201228
12 200627
13 201819
14 201914
15 200014
16 201813
17 201912
18 201610
19 202010
20 20179

About Inge M Thijs

Inge M Thijs is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Molecular Biology, Genetics, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and General Health Professions, having authored 31 papers that have together received 591 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (4 papers), Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (3 papers), Gene Regulatory Network Analysis (3 papers), Endometriosis Research and Treatment (2 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (2 papers), Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring (2 papers), Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (2 papers) and Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (102 citations), Endocrinology (46 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (55 citations), Food Science (54 citations) and Molecular Medicine (13 citations). Inge M Thijs has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Dorien Lanssens, Lars Grieten, Wilfried Gyselaers, Kathleen Marchal, Valérie Storms, Jos Vanderleyden, Sigrid C. J. De Keersmaecker, Kristof Engelen, Sharona Vonck and C. J. P. P. Smeets. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Internet Research, JMIR mhealth and uhealth, BMC Genomics, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact