Inge Liekens

1.4k total citations
31 papers, 950 citations indexed

About

Inge Liekens is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Economics and Econometrics and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. According to data from OpenAlex, Inge Liekens has authored 31 papers receiving a total of 950 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 18 papers in Economics and Econometrics and 12 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. Recurrent topics in Inge Liekens's work include Land Use and Ecosystem Services (20 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (18 papers) and Environmental Conservation and Management (8 papers). Inge Liekens is often cited by papers focused on Land Use and Ecosystem Services (20 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (18 papers) and Environmental Conservation and Management (8 papers). Inge Liekens collaborates with scholars based in Belgium, Hong Kong and United Kingdom. Inge Liekens's co-authors include Steven Broekx, Leo De Nocker, Jeremy De Valck, Roy Brouwer, Marije Schaafsma, Wendy Y. Chen, Liesbet Vranken, Joris Aertsens, Dries Landuyt and Jan Staes and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Atmospheric Environment and Journal of Environmental Management.

In The Last Decade

Inge Liekens

30 papers receiving 915 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Inge Liekens Belgium 18 537 472 208 169 105 31 950
Marianne Zandersen Denmark 18 819 1.5× 392 0.8× 383 1.8× 209 1.2× 137 1.3× 41 1.3k
Alfred Wagtendonk Netherlands 20 567 1.1× 405 0.9× 175 0.8× 229 1.4× 376 3.6× 43 1.3k
Nele Lienhoop Germany 20 981 1.8× 704 1.5× 130 0.6× 363 2.1× 156 1.5× 37 1.4k
Armando González‐Cabán United States 22 1.0k 1.9× 702 1.5× 101 0.5× 212 1.3× 222 2.1× 81 1.6k
David A. Newburn United States 15 445 0.8× 481 1.0× 62 0.3× 111 0.7× 136 1.3× 39 913
Marisa J. Mazzotta United States 16 390 0.7× 442 0.9× 68 0.3× 227 1.3× 109 1.0× 30 798
Tomasz Żylicz Poland 12 243 0.5× 334 0.7× 86 0.4× 172 1.0× 61 0.6× 50 646
De Zhou China 14 634 1.2× 144 0.3× 122 0.6× 154 0.9× 189 1.8× 31 924
Leo De Nocker Belgium 13 298 0.6× 202 0.4× 143 0.7× 91 0.5× 76 0.7× 29 693

Countries citing papers authored by Inge Liekens

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Inge Liekens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inge Liekens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inge Liekens more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Inge Liekens

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inge Liekens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inge Liekens. The network helps show where Inge Liekens may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Inge Liekens

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Inge Liekens. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Inge Liekens based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Inge Liekens. Inge Liekens is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Nocker, Leo De, Inge Liekens, Carolien Beckx, & Steven Broekx. (2023). Valuation of health benefits of green-blue areas for the purpose of ecosystem accounting: a pilot in Flanders, Belgium. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 8. 2 indexed citations
2.
Nocker, Leo De, Inge Liekens, Els Verachtert, et al.. (2022). Accounting for the recreation benefits of the Flemish Natura 2000 network through landscape preferences and estimated spending. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 7. 4 indexed citations
3.
Chen, Wendy Y., et al.. (2022). Environmental information disclosure and public choice decisions for urban river restoration: A comparative study between Brussels (Belgium) and Guangzhou (China). Journal of Environmental Management. 319. 115692–115692. 5 indexed citations
4.
Hua, Junyi, et al.. (2021). Partial attribute attendance in environmental choice experiments: A comparative case study between Guangzhou (China) and Brussels (Belgium). Journal of Environmental Management. 285. 112107–112107. 4 indexed citations
5.
Vrebos, Dirk, Jan Staes, Steven Broekx, et al.. (2020). Facilitating spatially-explicit assessments of ecosystem service delivery to support land use planning. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 5. 6 indexed citations
6.
Lauwaet, Dirk, Ton de Nijs, Inge Liekens, et al.. (2018). A new method for fine-scale assessments of the average urban Heat island over large areas and the effectiveness of nature-based solutions. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3. 5 indexed citations
7.
Dendoncker, Nicolas, Francis Turkelboom, Fanny Boeraeve, et al.. (2018). Integrating Ecosystem Services values for sustainability? Evidence from the Belgium Ecosystem Services community of practice. Ecosystem Services. 31. 68–76. 17 indexed citations
8.
Chen, Wendy Y., Junyi Hua, Inge Liekens, & Steven Broekx. (2018). Preference heterogeneity and scale heterogeneity in urban river restoration: A comparative study between Brussels and Guangzhou using discrete choice experiments. Landscape and Urban Planning. 173. 9–22. 37 indexed citations
9.
Chen, Wendy Y., Inge Liekens, & Steven Broekx. (2017). Identifying Societal Preferences for River Restoration in a Densely Populated Urban Environment: Evidence from a Discrete Choice Experiment in Central Brussels. Environmental Management. 60(2). 263–279. 34 indexed citations
10.
Lizin, Sebastien, et al.. (2016). Accounting for substitution and spatial heterogeneity in a labelled choice experiment. Journal of Environmental Management. 181. 289–297. 24 indexed citations
11.
Chen, Wendy Y., Joris Aertsens, Inge Liekens, Steven Broekx, & Leo De Nocker. (2014). Impact of Perceived Importance of Ecosystem Services and Stated Financial Constraints on Willingness to Pay for Riparian Meadow Restoration in Flanders (Belgium). Environmental Management. 54(2). 346–359. 26 indexed citations
12.
Landuyt, Dries, Pieter Lemmens, Rob D'hondt, et al.. (2014). An ecosystem service approach to support integrated pond management: A case study using Bayesian belief networks – Highlighting opportunities and risks. Journal of Environmental Management. 145. 79–87. 53 indexed citations
13.
Schaafsma, Marije, Roy Brouwer, Inge Liekens, & Leo De Nocker. (2014). Temporal stability of preferences and willingness to pay for natural areas in choice experiments: A test–retest. Resource and Energy Economics. 38. 243–260. 52 indexed citations
14.
Valck, Jeremy De, Steven Broekx, Inge Liekens, et al.. (2014). Benefits of clearing forest plantations to restore nature? Evidence from a discrete choice experiment in Flanders, Belgium. Landscape and Urban Planning. 125. 65–75. 50 indexed citations
15.
Broekx, Steven, Inge Liekens, Leo De Nocker, et al.. (2013). A web application to support the quantification and valuation of ecosystem services. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 40. 65–74. 43 indexed citations
16.
Liekens, Inge, Marije Schaafsma, Leo De Nocker, et al.. (2012). Developing a value function for nature development and land use policy in Flanders, Belgium. Land Use Policy. 30(1). 549–559. 54 indexed citations
17.
Bateman, Ian J., Roy Brouwer, Silvia Ferrini, et al.. (2011). Making Benefit Transfers Work: Deriving and Testing Principles for Value Transfers for Similar and Dissimilar Sites Using a Case Study of the Non-Market Benefits of Water Quality Improvements Across Europe. Environmental and Resource Economics. 50(3). 365–387. 162 indexed citations
18.
Mensink, Clemens, Nico Bleux, Patrick Berghmans, et al.. (2011). Quantification of diffuse and fugitive PM10 sources by integrated “hot-spot” method. Atmospheric Environment. 45(13). 2233–2241. 2 indexed citations
19.
Aertsens, Joris, Bas de Geus, Grégory Vandenbulcke, et al.. (2010). Commuting by bike in Belgium, the costs of minor accidents. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 42(6). 2149–2157. 64 indexed citations
20.
Nocker, L. De, et al.. (2006). Cost-benefit analysis to select the optimal flood protection strategy along the Scheldt. WIT transactions on ecology and the environment. 1. 271–277. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Marianne Zandersen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Alfred Wagtendonk Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Nele Lienhoop Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Armando González‐Cabán Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by David A. Newburn Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Marisa J. Mazzotta Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Tomasz Żylicz Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by De Zhou Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Leo De Nocker
Rankless by CCL
2026