Inga Niedtfeld
- Clinical Psychology top 1%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Philosophy top 1%
- Co-authors
- Christian SchmahlLars SchulzeMartin BohusSabine C. HerpertzPeter KirschJohanna HeppStefanie LisRuth Schmitt
- Topics
- Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (39 papers)Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (18 papers)Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (12 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEBiological Psychiatry
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Inga Niedtfeld
54 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Clinical Psychology 1.7k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 870
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 401
- Cognitive Neuroscience 311
- Philosophy 292
Countries citing papers authored by Inga Niedtfeld
This map shows the geographic impact of Inga Niedtfeld's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inga Niedtfeld with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inga Niedtfeld more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Inga Niedtfeld
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inga Niedtfeld. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inga Niedtfeld. The network helps show where Inga Niedtfeld may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Inga Niedtfeld
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Inga Niedtfeld. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Inga Niedtfeld based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Inga Niedtfeld. Inga Niedtfeld is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 77 | |
| 12 | 25 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 39 | |
| 15 | 43 | |
| 16 | 46 | |
| 17 | 221 | |
| 18 | 65 | |
| 19 | 93 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Inga Niedtfeld
Inga Niedtfeld is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 55 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (39 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (18 papers) and Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (1.7k citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (870 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (401 citations). Inga Niedtfeld has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Christian Schmahl, Lars Schulze, Martin Bohus, Sabine C. Herpertz, Peter Kirsch, Johanna Hepp, Stefanie Lis, Ruth Schmitt, Dorina Winter and Annegret Krause-Utz. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Biological Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.