Ineta Sokolowski
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Oncology top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Frede OlesenPeter VedstedJens SøndergaardRikke Pilegaard HansenAnders Bonde JensenMette Asbjoern NeergaardHelle Terkildsen MaindalHenrik Toft Sørensen
- Topics
- Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (10 papers)Cancer survivorship and care (6 papers)Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- DenmarkNetherlandsUnited States
In The Last Decade
Ineta Sokolowski
31 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
- General Health Professions 481
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 470
- Oncology 390
- Epidemiology 216
- Clinical Psychology 202
Countries citing papers authored by Ineta Sokolowski
This map shows the geographic impact of Ineta Sokolowski's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ineta Sokolowski with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ineta Sokolowski more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ineta Sokolowski
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ineta Sokolowski. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ineta Sokolowski. The network helps show where Ineta Sokolowski may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ineta Sokolowski
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ineta Sokolowski. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ineta Sokolowski based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ineta Sokolowski. Ineta Sokolowski is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18 | |
| 2 | 14 | |
| 3 | 43 | |
| 4 | 16 | |
| 5 | 37 | |
| 6 | 36 | |
| 7 | 180 | |
| 8 | 59 | |
| 9 | 28 | |
| 10 | 27 | |
| 11 | 25 | |
| 12 | Associations between home-death and general practioner involvement in palliative care | 3 |
| 13 | 98 | |
| 14 | 39 | |
| 15 | 42 | |
| 16 | 38 | |
| 17 | 13 | |
| 18 | 104 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | 50 |
About Ineta Sokolowski
Ineta Sokolowski is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (10 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (6 papers) and Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (123 citations), General Health Professions (481 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (470 citations). Ineta Sokolowski has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Frede Olesen, Peter Vedsted, Jens Søndergaard, Rikke Pilegaard Hansen, Anders Bonde Jensen, Mette Asbjoern Neergaard, Helle Terkildsen Maindal, Henrik Toft Sørensen, Trine Brogaard and Lars Østergaard. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Public Health, BMC Health Services Research and European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.