Ina Schaefer

1.4k total citations
35 papers, 641 citations indexed

About

Ina Schaefer is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology and Insect Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Ina Schaefer has authored 35 papers receiving a total of 641 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 30 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 17 papers in Ecology and 9 papers in Insect Science. Recurrent topics in Ina Schaefer's work include Study of Mite Species (23 papers), Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology (10 papers) and Collembola Taxonomy and Ecology Studies (8 papers). Ina Schaefer is often cited by papers focused on Study of Mite Species (23 papers), Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology (10 papers) and Collembola Taxonomy and Ecology Studies (8 papers). Ina Schaefer collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and China. Ina Schaefer's co-authors include Stefan Scheu, Mark Maraun, Roy A. Norton, Tancredi Caruso, Tanja Schwander, Jens Bast, Ting‐Wen Chen, Katja Domes, Ken Kraaijeveld and Aidan M. Keith and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Communications and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Ina Schaefer

33 papers receiving 623 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ina Schaefer Germany 17 459 237 191 133 89 35 641
Helena Wirta Finland 17 379 0.8× 319 1.3× 175 0.9× 167 1.3× 159 1.8× 37 811
Georg F. J. Armbruster Switzerland 14 236 0.5× 221 0.9× 161 0.8× 137 1.0× 147 1.7× 39 532
Bernhard Eitzinger Germany 12 191 0.4× 261 1.1× 123 0.6× 64 0.5× 86 1.0× 19 436
Virgílio Vieira Portugal 11 226 0.5× 151 0.6× 171 0.9× 176 1.3× 115 1.3× 61 534
Prarthana S. Dharampal United States 15 365 0.8× 203 0.9× 327 1.7× 202 1.5× 40 0.4× 21 587
R. G. Booth United Kingdom 14 312 0.7× 221 0.9× 295 1.5× 62 0.5× 95 1.1× 42 627
Gergely Várkonyi Finland 14 350 0.8× 196 0.8× 236 1.2× 117 0.9× 109 1.2× 33 580
Libor Dvořák Czechia 14 342 0.7× 220 0.9× 377 2.0× 189 1.4× 64 0.7× 77 596
Marie‐Claude Larivière New Zealand 10 322 0.7× 153 0.6× 232 1.2× 94 0.7× 96 1.1× 53 521
Marc A. A. Pollet Belgium 15 538 1.2× 263 1.1× 387 2.0× 135 1.0× 99 1.1× 99 753

Countries citing papers authored by Ina Schaefer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ina Schaefer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ina Schaefer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ina Schaefer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ina Schaefer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ina Schaefer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ina Schaefer. The network helps show where Ina Schaefer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ina Schaefer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ina Schaefer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ina Schaefer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ina Schaefer. Ina Schaefer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Chen, Ting‐Wen, Jing‐Zhong Lu, Zhijing Xie, et al.. (2025). Older Lineages of Oribatid Mites in Mountain Ranges Have Broader Geographic Ranges and Exhibit More Generalistic Traits. Ecology and Evolution. 15(3). e71046–e71046.
2.
Lu, Jing‐Zhong, Christian Ammer, Tancredi Caruso, et al.. (2024). Functional traits in soil-living oribatid mites unveil trophic reorganization in belowground communities by introduced tree species. Geoderma. 448. 116947–116947. 8 indexed citations
3.
Lu, Jing‐Zhong, et al.. (2024). Niche dimensions in soil oribatid mite community assembly under native and introduced tree species. Ecology and Evolution. 14(5). e11431–e11431. 1 indexed citations
4.
Hickler, Thomas, Karin Hohberg, Ricarda Lehmitz, et al.. (2024). Genomic evidence for the widespread presence of GH45 cellulases among soil invertebrates. Molecular Ecology. 33(20). e17351–e17351. 1 indexed citations
5.
Chao, Huizhen, et al.. (2024). Litter quality modulates changes in bacterial and fungal communities during the gut transit of earthworm species of different ecological groups. ISME Communications. 5(1). ycae171–ycae171. 2 indexed citations
6.
Roth, Alexander M., et al.. (2023). Population structure and genetic variance among local populations of a non-native earthworm species in Minnesota, USA. Biological Invasions. 25(7). 2361–2375.
7.
Maraun, Mark, et al.. (2022). Dispersal patterns of oribatid mites across habitats and seasons. Experimental and Applied Acarology. 86(2). 173–187. 9 indexed citations
8.
Brandt, Alexander, Patrick Tran Van, Zoé Dumas, et al.. (2021). Haplotype divergence supports long-term asexuality in the oribatid mite Oppiella nova. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 118(38). 26 indexed citations
9.
Schaefer, Ina, Stefan Scheu, Andrei V. Tanasevitch, et al.. (2020). Different groups of ground‐dwelling spiders share similar trophic niches in temperate forests. Ecological Entomology. 45(6). 1346–1356. 7 indexed citations
10.
Schaefer, Ina & Tancredi Caruso. (2019). Oribatid mites show that soil food web complexity and close aboveground-belowground linkages emerged in the early Paleozoic. Communications Biology. 2(1). 387–387. 25 indexed citations
11.
Brandt, Alexander, Ina Schaefer, Tanja Schwander, et al.. (2017). Effective purifying selection in ancient asexual oribatid mites. Nature Communications. 8(1). 873–873. 38 indexed citations
14.
Scheu, Stefan, et al.. (2016). Founder events and pre-glacial divergences shape the genetic structure of European Collembola species. BMC Evolutionary Biology. 16(1). 148–148. 19 indexed citations
15.
Lehmitz, Ricarda, et al.. (2016). Convergent evolution of aquatic life by sexual and parthenogenetic oribatid mites. Experimental and Applied Acarology. 70(4). 439–453. 19 indexed citations
16.
Bast, Jens, Ina Schaefer, Tanja Schwander, et al.. (2015). No Accumulation of Transposable Elements in Asexual Arthropods. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 33(3). 697–706. 47 indexed citations
17.
Scheu, Stefan, et al.. (2015). Phylogeny and species delineation in European species of the genus Steganacarus (Acari, Oribatida) using mitochondrial and nuclear markers. Experimental and Applied Acarology. 66(2). 173–186. 10 indexed citations
18.
Maraun, Mark, et al.. (2014). Evidence for Frozen-Niche Variation in a Cosmopolitan Parthenogenetic Soil Mite Species (Acari, Oribatida). PLoS ONE. 9(11). e113268–e113268. 15 indexed citations
19.
Domes, Katja, et al.. (2012). Convergent evolution of defense mechanisms in oribatid mites (Acari, Oribatida) shows no “ghosts of predation past”. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 65(2). 412–420. 33 indexed citations
20.
Schaefer, Ina, Roy A. Norton, Stefan Scheu, & Mark Maraun. (2010). Arthropod colonization of land – Linking molecules and fossils in oribatid mites (Acari, Oribatida). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 57(1). 113–121. 77 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026