Ina Pech

422 total citations
9 papers, 314 citations indexed

About

Ina Pech is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science and Atmospheric Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Ina Pech has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 314 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 3 papers in Atmospheric Science. Recurrent topics in Ina Pech's work include Flood Risk Assessment and Management (9 papers), Disaster Management and Resilience (4 papers) and Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research (3 papers). Ina Pech is often cited by papers focused on Flood Risk Assessment and Management (9 papers), Disaster Management and Resilience (4 papers) and Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research (3 papers). Ina Pech collaborates with scholars based in Germany. Ina Pech's co-authors include Annegret H. Thieken, Heidi Kreibich, Meike Müller, Sarah Kienzler, Florian Elmer, Kai Schröter, Martina Baborowski, Karl‐Erich Lindenschmidt, Philip Bubeck and Viktor Rözer and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Science of The Total Environment and Natural hazards and earth system sciences.

In The Last Decade

Ina Pech

8 papers receiving 303 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ina Pech Germany 6 271 115 103 87 26 9 314
Maria Elena Topa Italy 5 251 0.9× 81 0.7× 44 0.4× 79 0.9× 56 2.2× 9 315
Marc Girons Lopez Sweden 9 249 0.9× 139 1.2× 51 0.5× 174 2.0× 64 2.5× 15 353
Bruno Büchele Germany 3 270 1.0× 72 0.6× 42 0.4× 138 1.6× 34 1.3× 3 321
Iulii Didovets Germany 10 241 0.9× 81 0.7× 53 0.5× 227 2.6× 37 1.4× 22 359
Charles Iceland United States 6 162 0.6× 86 0.7× 49 0.5× 72 0.8× 27 1.0× 15 258
Anna Linde Netherlands 7 361 1.3× 102 0.9× 30 0.3× 247 2.8× 33 1.3× 11 410
T. Petrow Germany 5 439 1.6× 153 1.3× 213 2.1× 124 1.4× 15 0.6× 5 489
Rita Lammersen Netherlands 4 228 0.8× 101 0.9× 26 0.3× 118 1.4× 16 0.6× 6 310
Katie Muchan United Kingdom 9 262 1.0× 72 0.6× 25 0.2× 181 2.1× 48 1.8× 16 342
Shuying Yu China 12 262 1.0× 43 0.4× 50 0.5× 39 0.4× 79 3.0× 14 326

Countries citing papers authored by Ina Pech

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ina Pech's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ina Pech with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ina Pech more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ina Pech

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ina Pech. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ina Pech. The network helps show where Ina Pech may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ina Pech

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ina Pech. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ina Pech based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ina Pech. Ina Pech is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Kreibich, Heidi, Ina Pech, Kai Schröter, Meike Müller, & Annegret H. Thieken. (2016). Floods in 2002 and 2013: comparing flood warnings and emergency measures from the perspective of affected parties. EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts. 1 indexed citations
2.
Kreibich, Heidi, Ina Pech, Kai Schröter, Meike Müller, & Annegret H. Thieken. (2016). New insights into flood warning and emergency response from the perspective of affected parties. 8 indexed citations
3.
Rözer, Viktor, Meike Müller, Philip Bubeck, et al.. (2016). Coping with Pluvial Floods by Private Households. Water. 8(7). 304–304. 73 indexed citations
4.
Kienzler, Sarah, Heidi Kreibich, Meike Müller, Ina Pech, & Annegret H. Thieken. (2016). Assessment of flood loss model transferability considering changes in precaution of flood-affected residents in Germany. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 7. 13002–13002. 1 indexed citations
5.
Kienzler, Sarah, Ina Pech, Heidi Kreibich, Meike Müller, & Annegret H. Thieken. (2015). After the extreme flood in 2002: changes in preparedness, response and recovery of flood-affected residents in Germany between 2005 and 2011. Natural hazards and earth system sciences. 15(3). 505–526. 86 indexed citations
6.
Kreibich, Heidi, Kathrin Poser, Ina Pech, & Meike Müller. (2013). Flood information from affected people - gains and uncertainties. Publication Database GFZ (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences). 1 indexed citations
7.
Elmer, Florian, Annegret H. Thieken, Ina Pech, & Heidi Kreibich. (2010). Influence of flood frequency on residential building losses. Natural hazards and earth system sciences. 10(10). 2145–2159. 102 indexed citations
8.
Lindenschmidt, Karl‐Erich, Ina Pech, & Martina Baborowski. (2008). Environmental risk of dissolved oxygen depletion of diverted flood waters in river polder systems – A quasi-2D flood modelling approach. The Science of The Total Environment. 407(5). 1598–1612. 28 indexed citations
9.
Lindenschmidt, K. E., et al.. (2006). Risk assessment and mapping of extreme floods in non-dyked communities along the Elbe and Mulde Rivers. Advances in geosciences. 9. 15–23. 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026