Philip Bubeck

5.9k total citations · 2 hit papers
59 papers, 3.9k citations indexed

About

Philip Bubeck is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science and Atmospheric Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip Bubeck has authored 59 papers receiving a total of 3.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 51 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 39 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 15 papers in Atmospheric Science. Recurrent topics in Philip Bubeck's work include Flood Risk Assessment and Management (48 papers), Disaster Management and Resilience (35 papers) and Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research (12 papers). Philip Bubeck is often cited by papers focused on Flood Risk Assessment and Management (48 papers), Disaster Management and Resilience (35 papers) and Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research (12 papers). Philip Bubeck collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and Italy. Philip Bubeck's co-authors include Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts, W. J. Wouter Botzen, Heidi Kreibich, Annegret H. Thieken, Hans de Moel, Laurens M. Bouwer, Paul Hudson, M. van Vliet, Jennifer K. Poussin and J.E.C. Dekkers and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Climate Change, World Development and Global Environmental Change.

In The Last Decade

Philip Bubeck

55 papers receiving 3.7k citations

Hit Papers

A Review of Risk Perceptions and Other Factors that Influ... 2012 2026 2016 2021 2012 2013 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Philip Bubeck Germany 28 3.0k 2.1k 869 535 345 59 3.9k
Edmund C. Penning‐Rowsell United Kingdom 41 4.0k 1.3× 2.0k 1.0× 970 1.1× 957 1.8× 429 1.2× 143 5.4k
Christian Kuhlicke Germany 26 2.2k 0.7× 2.2k 1.0× 480 0.6× 225 0.4× 232 0.7× 76 3.6k
Reinhard Mechler Austria 39 3.3k 1.1× 1.8k 0.9× 1.1k 1.2× 810 1.5× 247 0.7× 157 5.5k
Stefan Hochrainer‐Stigler Austria 31 1.9k 0.6× 1.2k 0.6× 373 0.4× 418 0.8× 230 0.7× 145 3.5k
Maarten van Aalst Netherlands 31 2.7k 0.9× 1.3k 0.6× 1.2k 1.3× 455 0.9× 176 0.5× 75 4.6k
Jaroslav Myšiak Italy 26 1.5k 0.5× 678 0.3× 358 0.4× 492 0.9× 391 1.1× 110 2.5k
Sally Priest United Kingdom 28 1.9k 0.6× 1.1k 0.5× 462 0.5× 320 0.6× 186 0.5× 73 2.3k
Jan Corfee-Morlot France 18 2.2k 0.7× 866 0.4× 1.1k 1.2× 301 0.6× 116 0.3× 41 3.9k
Thomas Thaler Austria 27 1.8k 0.6× 1.2k 0.6× 328 0.4× 260 0.5× 154 0.4× 104 2.4k
Reimund Schwarze Germany 20 1.8k 0.6× 660 0.3× 588 0.7× 435 0.8× 157 0.5× 74 2.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Bubeck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Bubeck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Bubeck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Bubeck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Bubeck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Bubeck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Bubeck. The network helps show where Philip Bubeck may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Bubeck

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Bubeck. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Bubeck based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Bubeck. Philip Bubeck is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Bubeck, Philip, et al.. (2025). Factors Influencing Mental Burden Caused by Flooding: Insights from the 2021 Flood in the Ahr Valley (Germany). Journal of Flood Risk Management. 18(4).
3.
Dillenardt, Lisa, et al.. (2024). Property-level adaptation to pluvial flooding: An analysis of individual behaviour and risk communication material. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change. 29(6). 4 indexed citations
5.
Thieken, Annegret H., et al.. (2023). Role of tourism on disaster recovery: A case study of Uttarakhand, India. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 95. 103878–103878. 3 indexed citations
6.
Bubeck, Philip, et al.. (2023). Identifying and characterising individual flood precautionary behaviour dynamics from panel data. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 94. 103835–103835. 4 indexed citations
7.
Duijndam, Sem, et al.. (2023). Drivers of migration intentions in coastal Vietnam under increased flood risk from sea level rise. Climatic Change. 176(2). 17 indexed citations
8.
Bubeck, Philip, et al.. (2023). A place‐based risk appraisal model for exploring residents’ attitudes toward nature‐based solutions to flood risks. Risk Analysis. 43(12). 2562–2580. 8 indexed citations
9.
Bubeck, Philip, et al.. (2021). Klimawandel - Klimakrise - Klimakollaps. 1 indexed citations
10.
Kuhlicke, Christian, Sebastian Seebauer, Paul Hudson, et al.. (2020). The behavioral turn in flood risk management, its assumptions and potential implications. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Water. 7(3). 136 indexed citations
11.
Hudson, Paul, et al.. (2020). Potential Linkages Between Social Capital, Flood Risk Perceptions, and Self-Efficacy. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science. 11(3). 251–262. 54 indexed citations
12.
Bubeck, Philip, et al.. (2020). Using Panel Data to Understand the Dynamics of Human Behavior in Response to Flooding. Risk Analysis. 40(11). 2340–2359. 40 indexed citations
13.
Hudson, Paul, et al.. (2020). Self‐stated recovery from flooding: Empirical results from a survey in Central Vietnam. Journal of Flood Risk Management. 14(1). 13 indexed citations
14.
Baldassarre, Giuliano Di, Heidi Kreibich, Sergiy Vorogushyn, et al.. (2018). Hess Opinions: An interdisciplinary research agenda to explore the unintended consequences of structural flood protection. Hydrology and earth system sciences. 22(11). 5629–5637. 88 indexed citations
15.
Kreibich, Heidi & Philip Bubeck. (2015). Direct Costs and Losses Due to the Disruption of Production Processes. 3 indexed citations
16.
Kreibich, Heidi, Philip Bubeck, M. van Vliet, & Hans de Moel. (2014). Damage-reducing measures to manage flood risks in a changing climate. EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts. 13080.
17.
Hudson, Paul, W. J. Wouter Botzen, Heidi Kreibich, Philip Bubeck, & J.C.J.H. Aerts. (2014). Evaluating the effectiveness of flood damage mitigation measures by the application of propensity score matching. Natural hazards and earth system sciences. 14(7). 1731–1747. 76 indexed citations
18.
Bubeck, Philip, W. J. Wouter Botzen, & Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts. (2012). A Review of Risk Perceptions and Other Factors that Influence Flood Mitigation Behavior. Risk Analysis. 32(9). 1481–1495. 861 indexed citations breakdown →
19.
Bubeck, Philip, Hans de Moel, Laurens M. Bouwer, & Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts. (2011). How reliable are projections of future flood damage?. Natural hazards and earth system sciences. 11(12). 3293–3306. 79 indexed citations
20.
Bubeck, Philip & Hans de Moel. (2010). Sensitivity analysis of flood damage calculations for the river Rhine. Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam). 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026