Ina Laura Pieper
- Biomedical Engineering
- Surgery
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- Emergency Medicine top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Catherine A. ThorntonYasmin FriedmannChris H. H. ChanVenkateswarlu KanamarlapudiKarl HawkinsGraham R. FosterStephen WestabyFarah Bhatti
- Topics
- Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (16 papers)Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (11 papers)Mesenchymal stem cell research (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSwedenIran
In The Last Decade
Ina Laura Pieper
20 papers receiving 344 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Biomedical Engineering 224
- Surgery 152
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 64
- Emergency Medicine 63
- Molecular Biology 50
Countries citing papers authored by Ina Laura Pieper
This map shows the geographic impact of Ina Laura Pieper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ina Laura Pieper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ina Laura Pieper more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ina Laura Pieper
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ina Laura Pieper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ina Laura Pieper. The network helps show where Ina Laura Pieper may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ina Laura Pieper
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ina Laura Pieper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ina Laura Pieper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ina Laura Pieper. Ina Laura Pieper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | Evolution of the Implantation Procedure for Real Heart TAH | 2 |
| 6 | 31 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 17 | |
| 10 | 31 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 55 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | Altered Th17/Treg Ratio in Recurrent Miscarriage after Treatment with Paternal Lymphocytes and Vitamin D3: a Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study. | 16 |
| 19 | 35 | |
| 20 | 55 |
About Ina Laura Pieper
Ina Laura Pieper is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Genetics and Emergency Medicine, having authored 20 papers that have together received 357 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (16 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (11 papers) and Mesenchymal stem cell research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medicine (63 citations), Biomedical Engineering (224 citations) and Hematology (40 citations). Ina Laura Pieper has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Sweden and Iran. Frequent co-authors include Catherine A. Thornton, Yasmin Friedmann, Chris H. H. Chan, Venkateswarlu Kanamarlapudi, Karl Hawkins, Graham R. Foster, Stephen Westaby, Farah Bhatti, Owen Bodger and Scott Fleming. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Immunology, Journal of Cellular Biochemistry and Stem Cell Research & Therapy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.