Imre Kovách

747 citations
42 papers · 490 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Imre Kovách

33 papers receiving 419 citations

Peers

Imre Kovách
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 222
  • Urban Studies 81
  • Geography, Planning and Development 74
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 33
  • Development 14
Replace Marit Rosol with:
Marit Rosol Germany
Bernardo Sorj Brazil
I.J. Terluin Netherlands
Liz Price United Kingdom
Irina Velicu Portugal
Jenny Briedenhann United Kingdom
Thomas Purcell United Kingdom
Francesca Governa Italy
Michael Barke United Kingdom
Giorgio Osti Italy
Imre Kovách relative to Marit Rosol Germany Marit Rosol's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Marit Rosol · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Imre Kovách

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Imre Kovách's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Imre Kovách with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Imre Kovách more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Imre Kovách

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Imre Kovách. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Imre Kovách. The network helps show where Imre Kovách may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Imre Kovách, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Imre Kovách Line = papers co-authored together Imre Kovách links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200675
2 200070
3 200947
4 200833
5 202130
6 202225
7 202024
8 201822
9 201622
10
Evaluating the European Approach to Rural Development: Grass-roots Experiences of the LEADER Programme
201521
11 202118
12 199416
13 202211
14 20238
15 20098
16 20228
17 20216
18 20155
19 20205
20 20194

About Imre Kovách

Imre Kovách is a scholar working on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Geography, Planning and Development, Urban Studies, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Plant Science, having authored 42 papers that have together received 490 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hungarian Social, Economic and Educational Studies (19 papers), Rural development and sustainability (17 papers), Environmental Education and Sustainability (3 papers), Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (3 papers), Urbanization and City Planning (3 papers), Agricultural Economics and Policy (2 papers), Agricultural Development and Management (2 papers) and Organic Food and Agriculture (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (222 citations), Urban Studies (81 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (74 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (33 citations) and Development (14 citations). Imre Kovách has collaborated with scholars based in Hungary, Czechia and France. Frequent co-authors include Eva Kučerová, Boldizsár Megyesi, Attila Bai, Péter Balogh, Kjell Andersson, Alex Franklin, Zoltán Gabnai, Zoltán Birkner, János Nagy and Miklós Hajdu. Their work appears in journals such as Sociologia Ruralis, Sustainability, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, Agronomy and Rural Sociology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact