Imran Shah

6.7k total citations · 2 hit papers
94 papers, 3.4k citations indexed

About

Imran Shah is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Molecular Biology and Small Animals. According to data from OpenAlex, Imran Shah has authored 94 papers receiving a total of 3.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 44 papers in Computational Theory and Mathematics, 41 papers in Molecular Biology and 17 papers in Small Animals. Recurrent topics in Imran Shah's work include Computational Drug Discovery Methods (43 papers), Animal testing and alternatives (17 papers) and Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (13 papers). Imran Shah is often cited by papers focused on Computational Drug Discovery Methods (43 papers), Animal testing and alternatives (17 papers) and Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (13 papers). Imran Shah collaborates with scholars based in United States, Finland and Netherlands. Imran Shah's co-authors include Richard Judson, Grace Patlewicz, John F. Wambaugh, Ann M. Richard, Russell S. Thomas, Antony Williams, Kamel Mansouri, Keith A. Houck, Nancy Baker and Chris Grulke and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Environmental Science & Technology and Bioinformatics.

In The Last Decade

Imran Shah

88 papers receiving 3.3k citations

Hit Papers

The CompTox Chemistry Dashboard: a community ... 2009 2026 2014 2020 2017 2009 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Imran Shah United States 28 1.2k 1.1k 1.0k 614 325 94 3.4k
Kamel Mansouri United States 25 1.5k 1.2× 1.7k 1.5× 1.1k 1.1× 485 0.8× 435 1.3× 52 4.0k
Daniel M. Rotroff United States 26 1.3k 1.1× 768 0.7× 910 0.9× 547 0.9× 163 0.5× 90 3.4k
Chris Grulke United States 26 1.7k 1.4× 1.0k 0.9× 948 0.9× 387 0.6× 549 1.7× 43 3.6k
Joanna Jaworska Poland 30 990 0.8× 2.0k 1.8× 1.0k 1.0× 518 0.8× 376 1.2× 76 4.7k
Warren Casey United States 30 821 0.7× 625 0.6× 994 1.0× 619 1.0× 133 0.4× 78 2.9k
Steven J. Enoch United Kingdom 31 720 0.6× 1.2k 1.0× 573 0.5× 401 0.7× 313 1.0× 79 2.7k
Sharon Munn Italy 17 1.1k 0.9× 416 0.4× 481 0.5× 365 0.6× 125 0.4× 24 2.3k
Stephen Ferguson United States 38 1.1k 0.9× 528 0.5× 1.6k 1.6× 460 0.7× 238 0.7× 108 5.1k
Alicia Paini Italy 25 780 0.6× 346 0.3× 388 0.4× 420 0.7× 169 0.5× 79 2.0k
Frédéric Y. Bois France 43 1.5k 1.2× 496 0.4× 1.6k 1.5× 321 0.5× 125 0.4× 217 6.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Imran Shah

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Imran Shah's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Imran Shah with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Imran Shah more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Imran Shah

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Imran Shah. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Imran Shah. The network helps show where Imran Shah may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Imran Shah

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Imran Shah. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Imran Shah based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Imran Shah. Imran Shah is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Banerjee, Arkaprava, Supratik Kar, Kunal Roy, et al.. (2025). From Feature‐Based Chemical Similarity to Chemical Language Models—A Paradigm Shift in Computer‐Aided Molecular Design and Property Predictions. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Molecular Science. 15(6).
3.
Shah, Imran, et al.. (2025). Can graph similarity metrics be helpful for analogue identification as part of a read-across approach?. Computational Toxicology. 34. 100353–100353. 1 indexed citations
4.
Shah, Imran, David A. Gallegos, Dennis J. Eastburn, et al.. (2025). Decoding cellular stress states for toxicology using single-cell transcriptomics. 1. 100046–100046.
5.
Harrill, Joshua, Logan J. Everett, Derik E. Haggard, et al.. (2024). Signature analysis of high-throughput transcriptomics screening data for mechanistic inference and chemical grouping. Toxicological Sciences. 202(1). 103–122. 10 indexed citations
6.
Bundy, Joseph L., Logan J. Everett, Johanna Nyffeler, et al.. (2024). High-Throughput Transcriptomics Screen of ToxCast Chemicals in U-2 OS Cells. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology. 491. 117073–117073. 6 indexed citations
7.
Patlewicz, Grace, et al.. (2024). A systematic analysis of read-across within REACH registration dossiers. Computational Toxicology. 30. 100304–100304. 8 indexed citations
8.
Franzosa, Jill A., Jessica A. Bonzo, John Jack, et al.. (2021). High-throughput toxicogenomic screening of chemicals in the environment using metabolically competent hepatic cell cultures. npj Systems Biology and Applications. 7(1). 7–7. 27 indexed citations
10.
Shah, Imran, et al.. (2021). Evaluating adaptive stress response gene signatures using transcriptomics. Computational Toxicology. 20. 100179–100179. 7 indexed citations
11.
Williams, Antony, Chris Grulke, Ann M. Richard, et al.. (2019). US-EPA CompTox Chemicals Dashboard – integrating chemistry and biology data to serve computational toxicology and environmental science. Figshare. 1 indexed citations
12.
Huang, Xiaozhong, Fan Lee, 要子 伊藤, et al.. (2019). Sequential drug delivery for liver diseases. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 149-150. 72–84. 7 indexed citations
13.
Harrill, Joshua, Imran Shah, R. Woodrow Setzer, et al.. (2019). Considerations for strategic use of high-throughput transcriptomics chemical screening data in regulatory decisions. Current Opinion in Toxicology. 15. 64–75. 69 indexed citations
14.
Lee, Jaeyoung, Mohamed Abdel‐Aty, & Imran Shah. (2018). Evaluation of surrogate measures for pedestrian trips at intersections and crash modeling. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 130. 91–98. 55 indexed citations
15.
Shah, Imran, et al.. (2017). Evaluation of Surrogate Measures for Pedestrian Exposure to Traffic Crashes at Intersections. Transportation Research Board 96th Annual MeetingTransportation Research Board. 1 indexed citations
16.
Shah, Imran, Jie Liu, Richard Judson, Russell S. Thomas, & Grace Patlewicz. (2016). Systematically evaluating read-across prediction and performance using a local validity approach characterized by chemical structure and bioactivity information. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 79. 12–24. 67 indexed citations
17.
Shah, Imran, R. Woodrow Setzer, John Jack, et al.. (2015). Using ToxCast™ Data to Reconstruct Dynamic Cell State Trajectories and Estimate Toxicological Points of Departure. Environmental Health Perspectives. 124(7). 910–919. 58 indexed citations
18.
Judson, Richard, Holly M. Mortensen, Imran Shah, Thomas B. Knudsen, & Fathi Elloumi. (2011). Using pathway modules as targets for assay development in xenobiotic screening. Molecular BioSystems. 8(2). 531–542. 13 indexed citations
19.
Judson, Richard, Fathi Elloumi, R. Woodrow Setzer, Zhen Li, & Imran Shah. (2008). A comparison of machine learning algorithms for chemical toxicity classification using a simulated multi-scale data model. BMC Bioinformatics. 9(1). 241–241. 57 indexed citations
20.
Rao, Shaoqi, et al.. (2003). PathMiner: predicting metabolic pathways by heuristic search. Bioinformatics. 19(13). 1692–1698. 55 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026