Imogene M. King
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Jacqueline FawcettMary B. KilleenChristina L. SieloffMaureen A. FreyJean WatsonJudith M. Saunders
- Topics
- Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (3 papers)Ethics in medical practice (3 papers)Healthcare, Law, Governance, and Management Studies (2 papers)
- Journals
- Nursing ResearchJONA The Journal of Nursing AdministrationWestern Journal of Nursing Research
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Imogene M. King
32 papers receiving 690 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
- General Health Professions 330
- Clinical Psychology 143
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 141
- Issues, ethics and legal aspects 99
- Sociology and Political Science 84
Countries citing papers authored by Imogene M. King
This map shows the geographic impact of Imogene M. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Imogene M. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Imogene M. King more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Imogene M. King
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Imogene M. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Imogene M. King. The network helps show where Imogene M. King may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Imogene M. King
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Imogene M. King. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Imogene M. King based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Imogene M. King. Imogene M. King is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11 | |
| 2 | Middle range theory development using King's conceptual system | 7 |
| 3 | 34 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 32 | |
| 7 | 25 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | Advancing King's systems framework and theory of nursing | 6 |
| 10 | 28 | |
| 11 | 71 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 21 | |
| 14 | 47 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | 17 |
About Imogene M. King
Imogene M. King is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Research and Theory and General Health Professions, having authored 32 papers that have together received 844 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (3 papers), Ethics in medical practice (3 papers) and Healthcare, Law, Governance, and Management Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (75 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (99 citations) and Leadership and Management (23 citations). Imogene M. King has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Jacqueline Fawcett, Mary B. Killeen, Christina L. Sieloff, Maureen A. Frey, Jean Watson and Judith M. Saunders. Their work appears in journals such as Nursing Research, JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration and Western Journal of Nursing Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.