I‐Mei Lin

65 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

I‐Mei Lin
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
  • Biological Psychiatry 51
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 406
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 59
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 187
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 109
Replace Cécile Dantzer with:
Cécile Dantzer France
Cora Weber Germany
Ansgar Conrad United States
Daniel I. Galper United States
Jan Houtveen Netherlands
Benjamin T. Mast United States
Margaret V. Savage United States
Flora Colledge Switzerland
HR Nagendra India
María Rodríguez‐Ayllón Spain
I‐Mei Lin relative to Cécile Dantzer France Cécile Dantzer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Cécile Dantzer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by I‐Mei Lin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of I‐Mei Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I‐Mei Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I‐Mei Lin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by I‐Mei Lin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by I‐Mei Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I‐Mei Lin. The network helps show where I‐Mei Lin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside I‐Mei Lin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with I‐Mei Lin Line = papers co-authored together I‐Mei Lin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012125
2 2014100
3 201377
4 201967
5 201862
6 201951
7 201750
8 201349
9 201834
10 201533
11 200932
12 201230
13 201628
14 201827
15 200824
16 201724
17 201523
18 201823
19 202021
20 202119

About I‐Mei Lin

I‐Mei Lin is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 70 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (29 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (9 papers), Cardiac Health and Mental Health (9 papers), Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (8 papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (8 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (7 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (7 papers) and Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (51 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (406 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (59 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (187 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (109 citations). I‐Mei Lin has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Sheng‐Yu Fan, Erik Peper, Xiaojun Lin, Cheng‐Fang Yen, Richard Harvey, Huang‐Chi Lin, I‐Hua Chu, Frances Chang, Yung‐Jong Shiah and Wai‐Cheong Carl Tam. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Affective Disorders, Psychiatry Research, Sensors, The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine and Journal of Personalized Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact