Ilja Tachecí
- Surgery top 10%
- Gastroenterology top 1%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 5%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 10%
- Oncology
- Co-authors
- Jan BurešMarcela KopáčováStanislav RejchrtOndřej KrejcarJ KvĕtinaAyan SealAparajita OjhaAnis Yazidi
- Topics
- Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment (24 papers)Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments (23 papers)Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment (15 papers)
- Journals
- GastroenterologyPLoS ONEMolecules
- Partner nations
- CzechiaUnited KingdomMalaysia
In The Last Decade
Ilja Tachecí
84 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
- Surgery 516
- Gastroenterology 513
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 304
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 246
- Oncology 224
Countries citing papers authored by Ilja Tachecí
This map shows the geographic impact of Ilja Tachecí's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ilja Tachecí with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ilja Tachecí more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ilja Tachecí
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ilja Tachecí. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ilja Tachecí. The network helps show where Ilja Tachecí may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ilja Tachecí
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ilja Tachecí. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ilja Tachecí based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ilja Tachecí. Ilja Tachecí is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 30 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | Virtual cases in internal medicine education | 3 |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 36 | |
| 15 | 20 | |
| 16 | Intravenous application of HI-6 salts (dichloride and dimethansulphonate) in pigs: comparison with pharmacokinetics profile after intramuscular administration. | 5 |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 20 | |
| 19 | 14 | |
| 20 | 19 |
About Ilja Tachecí
Ilja Tachecí is a scholar working on Gastroenterology, Family Practice and Surgery, having authored 98 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment (24 papers), Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments (23 papers) and Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (513 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (304 citations) and Surgery (516 citations). Ilja Tachecí has collaborated with scholars based in Czechia, United Kingdom and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Jan Bureš, Marcela Kopáčová, Stanislav Rejchrt, Ondřej Krejcar, J Kvĕtina, Ayan Seal, Aparajita Ojha, Anis Yazidi, Martin Kuneš and Tomáš Douda. Their work appears in journals such as Gastroenterology, PLoS ONE and Molecules.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.