Ilia Stepin

421 total citations · 1 hit paper
6 papers, 216 citations indexed

About

Ilia Stepin is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Political Science and International Relations and Management Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Ilia Stepin has authored 6 papers receiving a total of 216 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 1 paper in Political Science and International Relations and 1 paper in Management Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Ilia Stepin's work include Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) (5 papers), Machine Learning and Data Classification (3 papers) and Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques (1 paper). Ilia Stepin is often cited by papers focused on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) (5 papers), Machine Learning and Data Classification (3 papers) and Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques (1 paper). Ilia Stepin collaborates with scholars based in Spain, Italy and Poland. Ilia Stepin's co-authors include Alejandro Catalá, José M. Alonso, Martín Pereira-Fariña and Katarzyna Budzyńska and has published in prestigious journals such as IEEE Access, Information Sciences and IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine.

In The Last Decade

Ilia Stepin

6 papers receiving 212 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

A Survey of Contrastive and Counterfactual Explanation Generation Methods for Explainable Artificial Intelligence

2021 183 citations Ilia Stepin, José M. Alonso et al. IEEE Access profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Ilia Stepin Spain	4	183	33	26	17	16	6	216
Daniel Hesslow France	2	139 0.8×	23 0.7×	6 0.2×	5 0.3×	4 0.3×	4	194
Patrice Lopez Germany	6	172 0.9×	13 0.4×	8 0.3×	7 0.4×	13 0.8×	22	248
John Aslanides United Kingdom	4	142 0.8×	17 0.5×	27 1.0×	3 0.2×	2 0.1×	5	182
Mor Geva United States	11	329 1.8×	7 0.2×	10 0.4×	4 0.2×	6 0.4×	29	383
Xiangru Tang United States	7	234 1.3×	16 0.5×	2 0.1×	17 1.0×	2 0.1×	22	317
Niklas Muennighoff United States	6	302 1.7×	15 0.5×	5 0.2×	3 0.2×	3 0.2×	8	379
Timo Schick Germany	9	412 2.3×	14 0.4×	15 0.6×	2 0.1×	6 0.4×	13	466
Shehzaad Dhuliawala United States	6	155 0.8×	9 0.3×	4 0.2×	2 0.1×	4 0.3×	14	192
Sruti Srinivasa Ragavan United States	7	55 0.3×	21 0.6×	14 0.5×	3 0.2×	43 2.7×	13	191
Kalpesh Krishna United States	8	155 0.8×	12 0.4×	4 0.2×	2 0.1×	4 0.3×	17	200

Countries citing papers authored by Ilia Stepin

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ilia Stepin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ilia Stepin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ilia Stepin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ilia Stepin

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ilia Stepin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ilia Stepin. The network helps show where Ilia Stepin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ilia Stepin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ilia Stepin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ilia Stepin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ilia Stepin. Ilia Stepin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

6 of 6 papers shown

1.

Stepin, Ilia, et al.. (2024). How to Build Self-Explaining Fuzzy Systems: From Interpretability to Explainability [AI-eXplained]. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine. 19(1). 81–82. 5 indexed citations

2.

Stepin, Ilia, Katarzyna Budzyńska, Alejandro Catalá, Martín Pereira-Fariña, & José M. Alonso. (2023). Information-seeking dialogue for explainable artificial intelligence: Modelling and analytics. 15(1). 49–107. 1 indexed citations

3.

Stepin, Ilia, José M. Alonso, Alejandro Catalá, & Martín Pereira-Fariña. (2022). An empirical study on how humans appreciate automated counterfactual explanations which embrace imprecise information. Information Sciences. 618. 379–399. 9 indexed citations

4.

Stepin, Ilia, José M. Alonso, Alejandro Catalá, & Martín Pereira-Fariña. (2021). A Survey of Contrastive and Counterfactual Explanation Generation Methods for Explainable Artificial Intelligence. IEEE Access. 9. 11974–12001. 183 indexed citations breakdown →

5.

Stepin, Ilia, José M. Alonso, Alejandro Catalá, & Martín Pereira-Fariña. (2020). Generation and evaluation of factual and counterfactual explanations for decision trees and fuzzy rule-based classifiers. 1–8. 16 indexed citations

6.

Stepin, Ilia, Alejandro Catalá, Martín Pereira-Fariña, & José M. Alonso. (2019). Paving the way towards counterfactual generation in argumentative conversational agents. 20–25. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact