I.L. Grach

544 total citations
23 papers, 411 citations indexed

About

I.L. Grach is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, I.L. Grach has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 411 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 1 paper in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and 1 paper in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in I.L. Grach's work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (20 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (20 papers) and High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (13 papers). I.L. Grach is often cited by papers focused on Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (20 papers), Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (20 papers) and High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (13 papers). I.L. Grach collaborates with scholars based in Russia, Italy and Netherlands. I.L. Grach's co-authors include I.M. Narodetskiǐ, Silvano Simula, G. Salmè, F. Cardarelli, E. Pace, L.A. Kondratyuk, L. Frankfurt, M. Strikman, B. O. Kerbikov and Yu. A. Simonov and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physics Letters B and Nuclear Physics A.

In The Last Decade

I.L. Grach

23 papers receiving 404 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
I.L. Grach Russia 9 397 48 15 11 7 23 411
Bing An Li United States 10 478 1.2× 34 0.7× 18 1.2× 8 0.7× 15 2.1× 43 498
E. Simopoulou Greece 10 282 0.7× 36 0.8× 16 1.1× 14 1.3× 10 1.4× 26 307
J. Pasupathy India 15 400 1.0× 21 0.4× 24 1.6× 5 0.5× 8 1.1× 42 426
A. Z. Dubničková Slovakia 11 360 0.9× 49 1.0× 9 0.6× 8 0.7× 5 0.7× 54 383
V.B. Kopeliovich Russia 10 287 0.7× 54 1.1× 12 0.8× 13 1.2× 5 0.7× 42 302
M. J. Savage United States 5 368 0.9× 75 1.6× 19 1.3× 9 0.8× 10 1.4× 7 402
Inga Karliner United States 8 248 0.6× 32 0.7× 11 0.7× 5 0.5× 4 0.6× 15 273
F. Fulda France 9 291 0.7× 28 0.6× 10 0.7× 5 0.5× 14 2.0× 11 309
R. Suaya United States 9 347 0.9× 32 0.7× 7 0.5× 12 1.1× 3 0.4× 13 365
S. Raither United States 11 565 1.4× 38 0.8× 12 0.8× 8 0.7× 11 1.6× 22 589

Countries citing papers authored by I.L. Grach

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of I.L. Grach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I.L. Grach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I.L. Grach more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by I.L. Grach

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by I.L. Grach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I.L. Grach. The network helps show where I.L. Grach may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of I.L. Grach

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of I.L. Grach. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of I.L. Grach based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with I.L. Grach. I.L. Grach is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Grach, I.L., et al.. (1996). HEAVY-TO-HEAVY AND HEAVY-TO-LIGHT WEAK DECAY FORM FACTORS IN THE LIGHT-FRONT APPROACH: THE EXCLUSIVE 0 − TO 0 − CASE a. Physics of Atomic Nuclei. 59. 2152–2163. 14 indexed citations
2.
Cardarelli, F., I.L. Grach, I.M. Narodetskiǐ, et al.. (1996). Charge form factor ofπandKmesons. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 53(11). 6682–6685. 56 indexed citations
3.
Grach, I.L., I.M. Narodetskiǐ, & Silvano Simula. (1996). Weak decay form factors of heavy pseudoscalar mesons within a light-front constituent quark model. Physics Letters B. 385(1-4). 317–323. 36 indexed citations
4.
Cardarelli, F., I.L. Grach, I.M. Narodetskiǐ, G. Salmè, & Silvano Simula. (1995). Radiative πϱ and πω transition form factors in a light-front constituent quark model. Physics Letters B. 359(1-2). 1–7. 34 indexed citations
5.
Cardarelli, F., I.L. Grach, I.M. Narodetskiǐ, G. Salmè, & Silvano Simula. (1995). Electromagnetic form factors of the ϱ meson in a light-front constituent quark model. Physics Letters B. 349(4). 393–399. 86 indexed citations
6.
Cardarelli, F., I.L. Grach, I.M. Narodetskiǐ, et al.. (1994). Hard constituent quarks and electroweak properties of pseudoscalar mesons. Physics Letters B. 332(1-2). 1–7. 66 indexed citations
7.
Grach, I.L. & I.M. Narodetskiǐ. (1994). Diquark correlations in the proton. Few-Body Systems. 16(4). 151–163. 3 indexed citations
8.
Grach, I.L., et al.. (1991). Weak NN forces - from mesons to quarks. Nuclear Physics A. 529(4). 701–712. 3 indexed citations
9.
Frankfurt, L., I.L. Grach, L.A. Kondratyuk, & M. Strikman. (1989). Is the Structure in the Deuteron Magnetic Form Factor atQ22GeV2New Evidence for Nuclear Core?. Physical Review Letters. 62(4). 387–390. 48 indexed citations
10.
Grach, I.L., et al.. (1989). P-odd one-meson exchanges revisited: a non-linear chiral model approach. The European Physical Journal C. 44(3). 393–400. 2 indexed citations
11.
Grach, I.L., B. O. Kerbikov, & Yu. A. Simonov. (1988). Nucleon--antinucleon low-energy interaction in the effective-range approximation. Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. (Engl. Transl.); (United States). 1 indexed citations
12.
Grach, I.L., B. O. Kerbikov, & Yu. A. Simonov. (1988). Effective range analysis of low-energy nucleon-antinucleon interaction. Physics Letters B. 208(2). 309–314. 20 indexed citations
13.
Grach, I.L., Yu. S. Kalashnikova, & I.M. Narodetskiǐ. (1988). Effects of six-quark bags on the1 D 2 NN partial wave and the question of dibaryon resonances. The European Physical Journal C. 38(3). 427–430. 1 indexed citations
14.
Grach, I.L., Yu. S. Kalashnikova, I.M. Narodetskiǐ, & V.P. Yurov. (1988). Description of the three-nucleon system in the quark compound bag method and the vertex function for the decay3He to pd. Journal of Physics G Nuclear Physics. 14(3). 305–308. 2 indexed citations
15.
Narodetskiǐ, I.M. & I.L. Grach. (1988). Bag-model inspired nucleon-nucleon potentials and the three-nucleon system. Few-Body Systems. 4(4). 211–224. 3 indexed citations
16.
Grach, I.L., Yu. S. Kalashnikova, & I.M. Narodetskiǐ. (1987). S-wave πN resonances and cryptoexotic q4q states. Nuclear Physics A. 469(4). 591–599. 4 indexed citations
17.
Bakker, B. L. G., I.L. Grach, & I.M. Narodetskiǐ. (1984). A P-matrix analysis of nucleon-nucleon scattering below 1 GeV inspired by the quark compound bag model. Nuclear Physics A. 424(3). 563–593. 13 indexed citations
18.
Grach, I.L., et al.. (1984). P-Matrix analysis of the dibaryon1 D 2 resonance. The European Physical Journal C. 21(3). 229–234. 4 indexed citations
19.
Grach, I.L. & L.A. Kondratyuk. (1983). ELECTROMAGNETIC FORM-FACTOR OF DEUTERON IN RELATIVISTIC DYNAMICS. TWO NUCLEON AND SIX QUARK COMPONENTS. Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. (Engl. Transl.); (United States). 39. 316–327. 6 indexed citations
20.
Simonov, Yu. A., et al.. (1980). Dispersion like treatment of a three-particle spectrum. Nuclear Physics A. 334(1). 80–92. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026