Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A Comprehensive Phylogeny of Beetles Reveals the Evolutionary Origins of a Superradiation
2007689 citationsMichael Balke, Ignacio Ribera et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Ignacio Ribera
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Ignacio Ribera's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ignacio Ribera with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ignacio Ribera more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ignacio Ribera. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ignacio Ribera. The network helps show where Ignacio Ribera may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ignacio Ribera
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ignacio Ribera.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ignacio Ribera based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ignacio Ribera. Ignacio Ribera is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Cieslak, Alexandra & Ignacio Ribera. (2009). Aplicaciones de proteómica en ecología y evolución. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 18(1). 34–43.4 indexed citations
Sánchez‐Fernández, David, Pedro Abellán, Cayetano Gutiérrez‐Cánovas, et al.. (2007). LOS MACROINVERTEBRADOS ACUÁTICOS DE LAS SALINAS DE AÑANA (ÁLAVA, ESPAÑA): BIODIVERSIDAD, VULNERABILIDAD Y ESPECIES INDICADORAS. Boletín de la SEA. 233–245.2 indexed citations
Millán, Andrés, et al.. (2005). Los coleópteros acuáticos y semiacuáticos de Doñana: reconocimeinto de su biodiversidad y prioridades de conservación. Boletín de la SEA. 157–164.19 indexed citations
Ribera, Ignacio, et al.. (2000). Phalacrichus max n. sp. (Coleoptera, Limnichidae) from Peru (America). RACO (Revistes Catalanes amb Accés Obert) (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya). 23(2). 103–106.
16.
Ribera, Ignacio, et al.. (2000). Taxonomic revision of the Afrotropical genus Cyclolimnichus Delève (Coleoptera : Limnichidae). African Entomology. 8(2). 211–216.1 indexed citations
17.
Ribera, Ignacio, G. N. Foster, Iain S. Downie, D. I. McCracken, & V. J. Abernethy. (1999). A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE MORPHOLOGY AND LIFE TRAITS OF SCOTTISH GROUND BEETLES (COLEOPTERA, CARABIDAE). Annales Zoologici Fennici. 36(1). 21–37.64 indexed citations
18.
Ribera, Ignacio, et al.. (1995). Autoecología de algunas especies de Hydradephaga (Coleoptera) de los Pirineos: II Dytiscidae. 59–103.5 indexed citations
19.
Ribera, Ignacio, et al.. (1994). Coleópteros acuáticos de los estanys de Capmany (Girona):: Hydradephaga. Universitat de Girona Digital Repository (Universitat de Girona). 17–34.5 indexed citations
20.
Ribera, Ignacio, et al.. (1993). Sobre la presencia de Hydrochara caraboides (Linnaeus, 1758) e Hydrophilus piceus (Linnaeus, 1758) en la Penísula Ibérica (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). 7–12.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.