Ignacio Matte Blanco

477 total citations
3 papers, 207 citations indexed

About

Ignacio Matte Blanco is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Philosophy and Infectious Diseases. According to data from OpenAlex, Ignacio Matte Blanco has authored 3 papers receiving a total of 207 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Clinical Psychology, 2 papers in Philosophy and 0 papers in Infectious Diseases. Recurrent topics in Ignacio Matte Blanco's work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper) and Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (1 paper). Ignacio Matte Blanco is often cited by papers focused on Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper) and Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (1 paper). Ignacio Matte Blanco collaborates with scholars based in . Ignacio Matte Blanco's co-authors include and has published in prestigious journals such as MLN and The International Journal of Psychoanalysis.

In The Last Decade

Ignacio Matte Blanco

3 papers receiving 134 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Ignacio Matte Blanco	3	98	49	43	21	20	3	207
Terry Marks-Tarlow United States	7	104 1.1×	73 1.5×	50 1.2×	13 0.6×	49 2.5×	29	246
Frank Cioffi United Kingdom	9	112 1.1×	33 0.7×	118 2.7×	47 2.2×	36 1.8×	30	297
Hartvig Dahl United States	12	266 2.7×	102 2.1×	50 1.2×	11 0.5×	53 2.6×	19	398
Edward F. Edinger	8	90 0.9×	109 2.2×	79 1.8×	29 1.4×	12 0.6×	33	261
James McClenon United States	11	65 0.7×	220 4.5×	111 2.6×	83 4.0×	15 0.8×	32	387
Stephen E. Braude United States	7	40 0.4×	84 1.7×	70 1.6×	25 1.2×	16 0.8×	36	234
James Morrison United States	8	41 0.4×	14 0.3×	60 1.4×	21 1.0×	38 1.9×	29	201
Gerald E. Myers United States	6	27 0.3×	50 1.0×	103 2.4×	63 3.0×	31 1.6×	23	231
Wilhelm Reich	9	80 0.8×	36 0.7×	29 0.7×	56 2.7×	10 0.5×	36	228
Louis Zinkin United Kingdom	9	160 1.6×	73 1.5×	30 0.7×	23 1.1×	7 0.3×	22	223

Countries citing papers authored by Ignacio Matte Blanco

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ignacio Matte Blanco's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ignacio Matte Blanco with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ignacio Matte Blanco more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ignacio Matte Blanco

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ignacio Matte Blanco. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ignacio Matte Blanco. The network helps show where Ignacio Matte Blanco may publish in the future.

No nodes

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

3 of 3 papers shown

1.

Blanco, Ignacio Matte, et al.. (2018). The Unconscious as Infinite Sets. 7 indexed citations

2.

Blanco, Ignacio Matte. (2005). The four antinomies of the death instinct. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis. 86(5). 1463–1476. 13 indexed citations

3.

Blanco, Ignacio Matte, et al.. (1979). The Unconscious as Infinite Sets: An Essay in Bi-Logic. MLN. 94(5). 1228–1228. 187 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact