I.D. Proctor

1.2k total citations
47 papers, 955 citations indexed

About

I.D. Proctor is a scholar working on Radiation, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Global and Planetary Change. According to data from OpenAlex, I.D. Proctor has authored 47 papers receiving a total of 955 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Radiation, 21 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics and 9 papers in Global and Planetary Change. Recurrent topics in I.D. Proctor's work include Nuclear Physics and Applications (24 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (18 papers) and Radioactive contamination and transfer (9 papers). I.D. Proctor is often cited by papers focused on Nuclear Physics and Applications (24 papers), Nuclear physics research studies (18 papers) and Radioactive contamination and transfer (9 papers). I.D. Proctor collaborates with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Germany. I.D. Proctor's co-authors include John Southon, John S. Vogel, J.C. Davis, Marc W. Caffee, D.W. Heikkinen, K.W. Turteltaub, M.L. Roberts, Robert C. Finkel, Barton L. Gledhill and D.E. Nelson and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Physical Review Letters and Physics Letters B.

In The Last Decade

I.D. Proctor

45 papers receiving 909 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
I.D. Proctor United States 17 276 247 172 138 136 47 955
J.C. Davis United States 17 345 1.3× 312 1.3× 79 0.5× 145 1.1× 92 0.7× 50 957
H.W. Taylor Canada 16 406 1.5× 544 2.2× 163 0.9× 28 0.2× 253 1.9× 94 940
Alfred Priller Austria 24 650 2.4× 232 0.9× 828 4.8× 454 3.3× 124 0.9× 113 2.1k
M. R. Clover United States 17 401 1.5× 531 2.1× 115 0.7× 180 1.3× 294 2.2× 34 1.1k
I.K. Bailiff United Kingdom 31 749 2.7× 31 0.1× 410 2.4× 155 1.1× 66 0.5× 103 2.3k
L. Desorgher Switzerland 19 304 1.1× 229 0.9× 164 1.0× 27 0.2× 46 0.3× 84 1.6k
M. J. Godfrey United Kingdom 13 142 0.5× 370 1.5× 77 0.4× 174 1.3× 184 1.4× 25 950
C. A. Kalfas Greece 15 225 0.8× 346 1.4× 128 0.7× 12 0.1× 203 1.5× 55 732
D.J.W. Mous Germany 18 376 1.4× 77 0.3× 185 1.1× 242 1.8× 50 0.4× 54 1.0k
D.W. Heikkinen United States 14 334 1.2× 420 1.7× 39 0.2× 58 0.4× 219 1.6× 71 818

Countries citing papers authored by I.D. Proctor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of I.D. Proctor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I.D. Proctor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I.D. Proctor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by I.D. Proctor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by I.D. Proctor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I.D. Proctor. The network helps show where I.D. Proctor may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of I.D. Proctor

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of I.D. Proctor. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of I.D. Proctor based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with I.D. Proctor. I.D. Proctor is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Vogel, John S., et al.. (2006). Accuracy, precision and throughput of (super 14) C measurements at the center for accelerator mass spectrometry; AMS.. Radiocarbon. 33(2). 244.
2.
McAninch, J.E., L.J. Hainsworth, Alfredo Marchetti, et al.. (1997). Measurement of 63Ni and 59Ni by accelerator mass spectrometry using characteristic projectile X-rays. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 123(1-4). 137–143. 28 indexed citations
3.
Marchetti, Alfredo, L.J. Hainsworth, J.E. McAninch, et al.. (1997). Ultra-separation of nickel from copper metal for the measurement of 63Ni by AMS. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 123(1-4). 230–234. 16 indexed citations
4.
Roberts, M.L., Graham Bench, Thomas A. Brown, et al.. (1997). The LLNL AMS facility. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 123(1-4). 57–61. 39 indexed citations
5.
McAninch, J.E., Graham Bench, Stewart P.H.T. Freeman, et al.. (1995). PXAMS — projectile X-ray AMS: X-ray yields and applications. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 99(1-4). 541–545. 22 indexed citations
6.
Southon, John, John S. Vogel, Susan Trumbore, et al.. (1992). Progress in AMS Measurements at the LLNL Spectrometer. Radiocarbon. 34(3). 473–477. 22 indexed citations
7.
Roberts, M.L., John Southon, J.C. Davis, I.D. Proctor, & D.E. Nelson. (1991). A dedicated AMS facility for 3H and 14C. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 56-57. 882–885. 3 indexed citations
8.
Southon, John, Marc W. Caffee, J.C. Davis, et al.. (1990). The new LLNL AMS spectrometer. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 52(3-4). 301–305. 35 indexed citations
9.
Proctor, I.D.. (1989). The AMS program at LLNL. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 40-41. 727–730. 8 indexed citations
10.
Pontau, A.E., A. J. Antolak, D.H. Morse, et al.. (1989). Ion microbeam tomography. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 40-41. 646–650. 61 indexed citations
11.
Bauer, Roman, J. A. Becker, I.D. Proctor, et al.. (1986). (p,t) reaction on even-mass cadmium nuclei: Test for the admixture of intruder configurations in the ground states. Physical Review C. 34(3). 1110–1113. 9 indexed citations
12.
Lanier, R. G., G.L. Struble, L. G. Mann, et al.. (1981). Evidence for a strongly deformed prolate shape at N = 87 from 154Eu and 152Eu(p, t) reactions. Physics Letters B. 99(1). 23–27. 5 indexed citations
13.
Mann, L. G., R. G. Lanier, G.L. Struble, et al.. (1979). Ta181(p,2nγ)W180reaction. Physical Review C. 19(4). 1191–1204. 8 indexed citations
14.
Lanier, R. G., et al.. (1978). Deformation change atN=89: Proton inelastic scattering at 12 MeV onEu151,152,153. Physical Review C. 18(4). 1609–1618. 11 indexed citations
15.
Lanier, R. G., et al.. (1978). On the stability of a ground-state rotational structure for the transitional nucleus 152Eu. Physics Letters B. 78(2-3). 217–220. 7 indexed citations
16.
Kashy, E., et al.. (1973). Three-Neutron Pickup Reaction onC13. Physical Review C. 7(6). 2251–2256. 15 indexed citations
17.
Benenson, W., E. Kashy, I.D. Proctor, & B. M. Preedom. (1973). The mass of 29S. Physics Letters B. 43(2). 117–118. 9 indexed citations
18.
Hinrichs, Ruth, R. Sherr, G. M. Crawley, & I.D. Proctor. (1970). AnomalousL=1Shapes of Angular Distributions for (He3,t) Transitions to0+Antianalog States inGa64,66andK40. Physical Review Letters. 25(12). 829–831. 51 indexed citations
19.
Austin, Sam M., et al.. (1969). Bによる陽子からのγ線と 10 Cの第一励起状態の励起エネルギー. Physical Review D. 182(4). 1104–1105. 3 indexed citations
20.
Proctor, I.D., et al.. (1968). Conical Pendulum Experiment. American Journal of Physics. 36(6). 555–556. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026