Ibraheem Nasser
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 5%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 5%
- Spectroscopy top 10%
- Mechanics of Materials
- Artificial Intelligence
- Co-authors
- Yukap HahnM S AbdelmonemH. BahlouliMostafa ZeamaK. J. LaGattutaA. D. AlhaidariR. FolkH. El Ghandoor
- Topics
- Quantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics (21 papers)Atomic and Molecular Physics (20 papers)Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (20 papers)
- Partner nations
- Saudi ArabiaEgyptUnited States
In The Last Decade
Ibraheem Nasser
56 papers receiving 624 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 540
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 187
- Spectroscopy 123
- Mechanics of Materials 60
- Artificial Intelligence 43
Countries citing papers authored by Ibraheem Nasser
This map shows the geographic impact of Ibraheem Nasser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ibraheem Nasser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ibraheem Nasser more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ibraheem Nasser
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ibraheem Nasser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ibraheem Nasser. The network helps show where Ibraheem Nasser may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ibraheem Nasser
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ibraheem Nasser. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ibraheem Nasser based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ibraheem Nasser. Ibraheem Nasser is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | Handling The Singularities of The Perturbed Kratzer and Inverted Kratzer Potentials | 1 |
| 13 | 25 | |
| 14 | 14 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 18 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 26 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 43 |
About Ibraheem Nasser
Ibraheem Nasser is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Spectroscopy, having authored 56 papers that have together received 642 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics (21 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (20 papers) and Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (20 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (540 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (187 citations) and Spectroscopy (123 citations). Ibraheem Nasser has collaborated with scholars based in Saudi Arabia, Egypt and United States. Frequent co-authors include Yukap Hahn, M S Abdelmonem, H. Bahlouli, Mostafa Zeama, K. J. LaGattuta, A. D. Alhaidari, R. Folk, H. El Ghandoor, Oskar Haidn and Chiara Manfletti. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. B, Condensed matter, Physical Review A and Physics Letters A.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.