Ian Logan
About
In The Last Decade
Ian Logan
11 papers receiving 208 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Molecular Biology 126
- Epidemiology 76
- Genetics 39
- Infectious Diseases 28
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 24
Countries citing papers authored by Ian Logan
This map shows the geographic impact of Ian Logan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian Logan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian Logan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ian Logan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian Logan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian Logan. The network helps show where Ian Logan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ian Logan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ian Logan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ian Logan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ian Logan. Ian Logan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 15 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 32 | |
| 9 | 54 | |
| 10 | 52 | |
| 11 | 26 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.