The Social Construction of What?2000 · 1.9k citations
What are hit papers?
Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if any of the following hold:
it has ≥500 total citations;
it reaches ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (the
threshold is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it);
it reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.
2000The Journal of Philosophy
2000Harvard University Press eBooks
1995Princeton University Press eBooks
1990Cambridge University Press eBooks
1988Noûs
1983Cambridge University Press eBooks
1978The Philosophical Review
1976Journal of the American Statistical Association
1966Journal of the American Statistical Association
This map shows the geographic impact of Ian Hacking's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian Hacking with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian Hacking more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian Hacking. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian Hacking. The network helps show where Ian Hacking may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ian Hacking, linked wherever they
have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers
they share.
Border = papers with Ian HackingLine = papers co-authored togetherIan Hacking links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
Showing the 20 most-cited of 207 papers — load more,
or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.