Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Ian Clark's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian Clark with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian Clark more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian Clark. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian Clark. The network helps show where Ian Clark may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ian Clark
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ian Clark.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ian Clark based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ian Clark. Ian Clark is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Clark, Ian, et al.. (2015). 'John and Jackey': An exploration of Aboriginal and Chinese people's associations on the Victorian goldfields. 13. 23.1 indexed citations
4.
Hammer, Nikolaus, et al.. (2015). A New Industry on a Skewed Playing Field: Supply Chain Relations and Working Conditions in UK Garment Manufacturing. Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester).7 indexed citations
5.
Clark, Ian. (2014). The Tara-Waragal and the Governor's levee in Melbourne, 1863 - a reinterpretation of Woiwurrung local group organisation. Australian aboriginal studies. 2014(1). 33.2 indexed citations
6.
Clark, Ian. (2013). Goulburn River Aboriginal Protectorate : a history of the Goulburn River Aboriginal Protectorate Station at Murchison Victoria, 1840-1853.. FedUni ResearchOnline (Federation University Australia).2 indexed citations
7.
Clark, Ian, et al.. (2011). Understanding 'Ngamadjidj': Aboriginal Perceptions of Europeans in Nineteenth Century Western Victoria. 13. 105.
Clark, Ian. (2010). Timothy Korkanoon: A Child Artist at the Merri Creek Baptist Aboriginal School, Melbourne, Victoria, 1846-47 - a New Interpretation of His Life and Work. Australian aboriginal studies. 2010(1). 31.1 indexed citations
10.
Clark, Ian, et al.. (2008). 'Why Should They Pay Money to the Queen?': Aboriginal Miners and Land Claims. FedUni ResearchOnline (Federation University Australia). 10(1). 115.
11.
Lacelle, Denis, et al.. (2008). ACID DRAINAGE AND ASSOCIATED SULPHATE MINERAL FORMATION NEAR EAGLE PLAINS, NORTHERN YUKON, CANADA: ANALOGUE TO THE MERIDIANI PLANUM SULPHATES ON MARS. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 1264.1 indexed citations
Clark, Ian. (2002). The Ebb and Flow of Tourism at Lal Lal Falls, Victoria: A Tourism History of a Sacred Aboriginal Site. Australian aboriginal studies. 2002(2). 45.5 indexed citations
15.
Clark, Ian, et al.. (2001). Iodine Systematics in the Ground Water of a Natural Setting. AGUFM. 2001.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.