I. Schienbein

6.6k total citations · 1 hit paper
89 papers, 2.1k citations indexed

About

I. Schienbein is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Biomedical Engineering and Computer Networks and Communications. According to data from OpenAlex, I. Schienbein has authored 89 papers receiving a total of 2.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 84 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 4 papers in Biomedical Engineering and 2 papers in Computer Networks and Communications. Recurrent topics in I. Schienbein's work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (83 papers), High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (67 papers) and Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (64 papers). I. Schienbein is often cited by papers focused on Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (83 papers), High-Energy Particle Collisions Research (67 papers) and Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (64 papers). I. Schienbein collaborates with scholars based in France, Germany and United States. I. Schienbein's co-authors include Bernd A. Kniehl, H. Spiesberger, Fred Olness, J. Y. Yu, E. Reya, M. Glück, G. Krämer, F. Lyonnet, A. Kusina and C. Keppel and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Nuclear Physics B.

In The Last Decade

I. Schienbein

82 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Hit Papers

nCTEQ15: Global analysis of nuclear parton distributions ... 2016 2026 2019 2022 2016 50 100 150 200

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
I. Schienbein France 26 2.0k 119 20 19 18 89 2.1k
S. Alekhin Russia 22 1.9k 0.9× 173 1.5× 21 1.1× 29 1.5× 27 1.5× 61 1.9k
Alejandro Daleo Switzerland 8 857 0.4× 161 1.4× 17 0.8× 20 1.1× 14 0.8× 12 881
S. Moch Germany 7 1.3k 0.6× 58 0.5× 25 1.3× 14 0.7× 28 1.6× 12 1.3k
É. Pilon France 16 900 0.4× 77 0.6× 17 0.8× 33 1.7× 36 2.0× 30 928
Max F. Zoller Switzerland 12 643 0.3× 138 1.2× 19 0.9× 16 0.8× 14 0.8× 20 666
Leszek Motyka Poland 21 1.5k 0.7× 127 1.1× 9 0.5× 21 1.1× 17 0.9× 55 1.5k
S. I. Troyan Russia 15 1.4k 0.7× 70 0.6× 18 0.9× 22 1.2× 11 0.6× 35 1.5k
Ambar Jain United States 9 767 0.4× 67 0.6× 12 0.6× 13 0.7× 12 0.7× 17 795
G. Aad France 18 937 0.5× 236 2.0× 50 2.5× 36 1.9× 34 1.9× 66 983
Duff Neill United States 14 991 0.5× 262 2.2× 16 0.8× 31 1.6× 26 1.4× 23 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by I. Schienbein

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of I. Schienbein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I. Schienbein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I. Schienbein more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by I. Schienbein

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by I. Schienbein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I. Schienbein. The network helps show where I. Schienbein may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of I. Schienbein

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of I. Schienbein. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of I. Schienbein based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with I. Schienbein. I. Schienbein is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Maniatis, M., et al.. (2025). The two-Higgs doublet model beyond tree-level: a gauge-invariant formalism. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2025(9). 1 indexed citations
2.
Bertone, Valerio, Tomáš Ježo, K. Kovařík, et al.. (2025). Heavy quark mass effects in charged-current deep-inelastic scattering at approximate NNLO in the Aivazis-Collins-Olness-Tung scheme. Physical review. D. 112(11).
3.
Ježo, Tomáš, O. Hen, C. Keppel, et al.. (2024). Modification of Quark-Gluon Distributions in Nuclei by Correlated Nucleon Pairs. Physical Review Letters. 133(15). 152502–152502. 3 indexed citations
4.
Ruíz, Richard, Alberto Accardi, T. J. Hobbs, et al.. (2024). Target mass corrections in lepton–nucleus DIS: Theory and applications to nuclear PDFs. Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics. 136. 104096–104096. 7 indexed citations
5.
6.
Hobbs, T. J., Tomáš Ježo, Michael Klasen, et al.. (2022). Impact of W and Z Production Data and Compatibility of Neutrino DIS Data in Nuclear Parton Distribution Functions. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1 indexed citations
7.
Asryan, G., Tomáš Ježo, Alberto Accardi, et al.. (2021). Extending nuclear PDF analyses into the high- x , low- Q2 region. DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology). 21 indexed citations
8.
Kusina, A., Jean-Philippe Lansberg, I. Schienbein, & Hua-Sheng Shao. (2018). Gluon Shadowing in Heavy-Flavor Production at the LHC. Physical Review Letters. 121(5). 52004–52004. 53 indexed citations
9.
Kusina, A., et al.. (2018). Impact of LHC Heavy-Flavour Data on Nuclear Gluon PDF. Acta Physica Polonica B. 49(6). 1185–1185. 1 indexed citations
10.
Kusina, A., F. Lyonnet, D. Clark, et al.. (2017). LHC Lead Data and Nuclear PDFs. Acta Physica Polonica B. 48(6). 1035–1035. 1 indexed citations
11.
Bertone, Valerio, D. Britzger, S. Camarda, et al.. (2017). Impact of the heavy-quark matching scales in PDF fits. The European Physical Journal C. 77(12). 837–837. 8 indexed citations
12.
Kusina, A., C. Keppel, F. Lyonnet, et al.. (2016). nCTEQ15 -- Global analysis of nuclear parton distributions with uncertainties. 41–41. 4 indexed citations
13.
Lyonnet, F., et al.. (2015). On the intrinsic bottom content of the nucleon and its impact on heavy new physics at the LHC. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2015(7). 19 indexed citations
14.
Lansberg, Jean-Philippe, V. Chambert, J.P. Didelez, et al.. (2012). Prospects for A Fixed-Target ExpeRiment at the LHC: AFTER@LHC. 547. 1 indexed citations
15.
Schienbein, I., Fred Olness, J. Y. Yu, et al.. (2011). Nuclear corrections in νA DIS and their compatibility with global NPDF analyses. AIP conference proceedings. 80–87. 2 indexed citations
16.
Kovařı́k, K., I. Schienbein, Fred Olness, et al.. (2011). Nuclear Corrections in Neutrino-Nucleus Deep Inelastic Scattering and their Compatibility with Global Nuclear Parton-Distribution-Function Analyses. Physical Review Letters. 106(12). 122301–122301. 65 indexed citations
17.
Schienbein, I.. (2011). Nuclear PDFs. Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements. 214(1). 73–79. 1 indexed citations
18.
Schienbein, I., J. Y. Yu, K. Kovařı́k, et al.. (2009). Parton distribution function nuclear corrections for charged lepton and neutrino deep inelastic scattering processes. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 80(9). 84 indexed citations
19.
Kniehl, Bernd A., G. Krämer, I. Schienbein, & H. Spiesberger. (2006). Reconciling Open-Charm Production at the Fermilab Tevatron with QCD. Physical Review Letters. 96(1). 12001–12001. 45 indexed citations
20.
Schienbein, I.. (1998). Leading log radiative corrections to polarized heavy flavor leptoproduction. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 59(1). 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026