I Nász
- Topics
- Virus-based gene therapy research (66 papers)Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects (33 papers)Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (10 papers)
In The Last Decade
I Nász
103 papers receiving 466 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
- Molecular Biology 229
- Genetics 190
- Epidemiology 88
- Infectious Diseases 84
- Oncology 67
Countries citing papers authored by I Nász
This map shows the geographic impact of I Nász's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I Nász with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I Nász more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by I Nász
This network shows the impact of papers produced by I Nász. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I Nász. The network helps show where I Nász may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of I Nász
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of I Nász. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of I Nász based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with I Nász. I Nász is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 38 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 32 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | Molecular cloning and physical mapping of the DNA of human adenovirus type 35. | 1 |
| 11 | Changes of adenovirus hexon associated with different passage history of Ad h 1. | 0 |
| 12 | Viral examinations in malignant tumours of the urogenital system. | 2 |
| 13 | Interaction of human lymphocytes and viruses in vitro. | 5 |
| 14 | Comparative studies on the soluble proteins of adenovirus type 1. | 1 |
| 15 | Isolation of an adenovirus from rabbitts (preliminary report). | 3 |
| 16 | Virological studies on gynaecological patients. | 3 |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | Isolation of type 14 adenovirus from an outbreak of tonsillopharyngitis. | 2 |
| 19 | STUDIES ON THE AETIOLOGY OF EPIDEMIC KERATOCONJUNCTIVITIS OBSERVED IN BUDAPEST DURING WINTER, 1961--1962. | 4 |
| 20 | Differences in the cytopathogenic effect of some adenovirus strains on human amniotic tissue cultures. | 3 |
About I Nász
I Nász is a scholar working on Genetics, Periodontics and Infectious Diseases, having authored 110 papers that have together received 515 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Virus-based gene therapy research (66 papers), Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects (33 papers) and Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Periodontics (37 citations), Genetics (190 citations) and Clinical Biochemistry (34 citations). I Nász has collaborated with scholars based in Hungary, Czechia and Myanmar. Frequent co-authors include P Geck, Éva Ádám, Anna Lengyel, K Sallay, Dan Pan, Orsolya Dobay, Csaba Jeney, J Horváth, Dan Peng and G Berencsi. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Analytical Biochemistry and Journal of Virology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.