I. M. Lewis
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- Political Science and International Relations top 1%
- Anthropology top 0.5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- K. O. L. BurridgeRalph A. LuebbenClifford GeertzBernardo BernardiLidwien KapteijnsIan CunnisonJames C. McCannJanice Boddy
- Topics
- African history and culture analysis (32 papers)Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (18 papers)Islamic Studies and History (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesMexico
In The Last Decade
I. M. Lewis
68 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
- Sociology and Political Science 926
- Political Science and International Relations 704
- Anthropology 678
- Social Psychology 131
- Clinical Psychology 129
Countries citing papers authored by I. M. Lewis
This map shows the geographic impact of I. M. Lewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I. M. Lewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I. M. Lewis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by I. M. Lewis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by I. M. Lewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I. M. Lewis. The network helps show where I. M. Lewis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of I. M. Lewis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of I. M. Lewis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of I. M. Lewis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with I. M. Lewis. I. M. Lewis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 123 | |
| 6 | Voice and power : the culture of language in North-East Africa : essays in honour of B. W. Andrzejewski | 7 |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | South of North: Shamanism in Africa: A Neglected Theme | 5 |
| 11 | 95 | |
| 12 | Êxtase religioso : um estudo antropológico da possessão por espírito e do xamanismo | 2 |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 16 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | The new East African Republic of Somalia | 0 |
| 19 | The Names Of God In Northern Somali | 1 |
| 20 | 5 |
About I. M. Lewis
I. M. Lewis is a scholar working on Anthropology, Political Science and International Relations and General Social Sciences, having authored 81 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include African history and culture analysis (32 papers), Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (18 papers) and Islamic Studies and History (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (678 citations), Archeology (42 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (704 citations). I. M. Lewis has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include K. O. L. Burridge, Ralph A. Luebben, Clifford Geertz, Bernardo Bernardi, Lidwien Kapteijns, Ian Cunnison, James C. McCann, Janice Boddy, B. W. Andrzejewski and John Beattie. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, British Journal of Sociology and American Anthropologist.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.