Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of I Herrmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I Herrmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I Herrmann more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by I Herrmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I Herrmann. The network helps show where I Herrmann may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of I Herrmann
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of I Herrmann.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of I Herrmann based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with I Herrmann. I Herrmann is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Herrmann, I. (2007). Influences of Statistical Analyses on Result Presentations of Oral Implant Treatment. Gothenburg University Publications Electronic Archive (Gothenburg University).6 indexed citations
3.
Herrmann, I, Ulf Lekholm, Sture Holm, & Christina Kultje. (2005). Evaluation of patient and implant characteristics as potential prognostic factors for oral implant failures.. PubMed. 20(2). 220–30.220 indexed citations
4.
Herrmann, I, Ulf Lekholm, Søren Holm, & Sigbritt Karlsson. (1999). Impact of implant interdependency when evaluating success rates: a statistical analysis of multicenter results.. PubMed. 12(2). 160–6.41 indexed citations
5.
Polizzi, Giovanni, et al.. (1999). Clinical application of narrow Brånemark System implants for single-tooth restorations.. PubMed. 14(4). 496–503.74 indexed citations
6.
Jemt, Torsten, John Chai, James Harnett, et al.. (1996). A 5-year prospective multicenter follow-up report on overdentures supported by osseointegrated implants.. PubMed. 11(3). 291–8.361 indexed citations
7.
Henry, Peter J., William R. Laney, Torsten Jemt, et al.. (1996). Osseointegrated implants for single-tooth replacement: a prospective 5-year multicenter study.. PubMed. 11(4). 450–5.365 indexed citations
8.
Steenberghe, Daniël van, I Herrmann, Charles L. Bolender, et al.. (1994). Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of partially edentulous jaws: A prospective 5-year multicenter study. 9(6). 627–635.348 indexed citations
9.
Laney, William R., Torsten Jemt, David Harris, et al.. (1994). Osseointegrated implants for single-tooth replacement: progress report from a multicenter prospective study after 3 years.. PubMed. 9(1). 49–54.204 indexed citations
Langer, Burton, Laureen Langer, I Herrmann, & L Jörnéus. (1993). The wide fixture: a solution for special bone situations and a rescue for the compromised implant. Part 1.. PubMed. 8(4). 400–8.128 indexed citations
12.
Jemt, Torsten, William R. Laney, David Harris, et al.. (1991). Osseointegrated implants for single tooth replacement: a 1-year report from a multicenter prospective study.. PubMed. 6(1). 29–36.239 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.