I. Ciepał

485 total citations
15 papers, 40 citations indexed

About

I. Ciepał is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Radiation and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, I. Ciepał has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 40 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 7 papers in Radiation and 5 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in I. Ciepał's work include Nuclear physics research studies (12 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (7 papers) and Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (7 papers). I. Ciepał is often cited by papers focused on Nuclear physics research studies (12 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (7 papers) and Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions (7 papers). I. Ciepał collaborates with scholars based in Poland, Netherlands and India. I. Ciepał's co-authors include E. Stephan, St. Kistryn, A. Kozela, N. Kalantar‐Nayestanaki, M. Mahjour‐Shafiei, P. U. Sauer, A. C. Fonseca, W. Zipper, A. Deltuva and M. Kiš and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Physics Letters B and Few-Body Systems.

In The Last Decade

I. Ciepał

8 papers receiving 39 citations

Peers

I. Ciepał
V. Tvaskis United States
H. Al Falou United Kingdom
Y. T. Liang United States
Y.-R. Yen United States
J.R. Pybus United States
J. Litzinger Germany
S. D. Reitzner United States
V. Tvaskis United States
I. Ciepał
Citations per year, relative to I. Ciepał I. Ciepał (= 1×) peers V. Tvaskis

Countries citing papers authored by I. Ciepał

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of I. Ciepał's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I. Ciepał with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I. Ciepał more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by I. Ciepał

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by I. Ciepał. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I. Ciepał. The network helps show where I. Ciepał may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of I. Ciepał

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of I. Ciepał. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of I. Ciepał based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with I. Ciepał. I. Ciepał is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
1.
Ciepał, I., et al.. (2025). Application of Kinematic Fit with Missing Particle Constraint in Proton–Proton Collisions with HADES. Acta Physica Polonica B Proceedings Supplement. 18(4). 1–1.
2.
Ciepał, I., N. Kalantar-Nayestanaki, St. Kistryn, et al.. (2019). Investigation of the quasi-free domain in deuteron-deuteron break-up using spin observables. Jagiellonian University Repository (Jagiellonian University). 2 indexed citations
3.
Ciepał, I., et al.. (2018). Reconstruction of the Neutron Momentum in the Deuteron Breakup Reaction. Acta Physica Polonica B. 49(3). 445–445. 1 indexed citations
4.
Ciepał, I., et al.. (2018). Cross Section of Transfer Reactions in $d+d$ Collisions at the Deuteron Beam Energy of 160 MeV. Acta Physica Polonica B. 49(3). 451–451.
5.
Kłos, B., I. Ciepał, St. Kistryn, et al.. (2017). Experimental Study of Three-Nucleon Dynamics in the Dp Breakup Collisions Using the WASA Detector. Few-Body Systems. 58(2). 1 indexed citations
6.
Stephan, E., St. Kistryn, I. Skwira-Chalot, et al.. (2017). Dynamics of Three-Nucleon System Studied in Deuteron–Proton Breakup Experiments. Few-Body Systems. 58(2).
7.
Kozela, A., I. Ciepał, B. Kłos, et al.. (2017). Systematic Study of Three-Nucleon System Dynamics in Deuteron–Proton Breakup Reaction. Few-Body Systems. 58(2). 1 indexed citations
9.
Kłos, B. & I. Ciepał. (2015). Systematic studies of the three-nucleon system dynamics in the deuteron-proton breakup reaction. AIP conference proceedings. 1681. 20008–20008.
10.
Kłos, B., I. Ciepał, St. Kistryn, et al.. (2014). Systematic Study of Three-Nucleon Systems Dynamics in the Cross Section of the Deuteron–Proton Breakup Reaction. Few-Body Systems. 55(8-10). 721–724. 2 indexed citations
11.
Kłos, B., I. Ciepał, St. Kistryn, et al.. (2014). Experimental study of relativistic effects in the dp breakup reaction using the WASA detector. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 66. 3045–3045. 1 indexed citations
12.
Kozela, A., I. Ciepał, B. Kłos, et al.. (2014). Investigation of three nucleon force effects in deuteron-proton breakup reaction. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 81. 6007–6007.
13.
Bodek, K., I. Ciepał, N. Kalantar-Nayestanaki, et al.. (2014). Experimental Investigation of the Few-Nucleon Dynamics in Deuteron-Deuteron Collision at 160 MeV. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 81. 6006–6006.
14.
Ciepał, I., K. Bodek, St. Kistryn, et al.. (2013). Three- and Four-nucleon Dynamics at Intermediate Energies. Acta Physica Polonica B Proceedings Supplement. 6(4). 1167–1167. 1 indexed citations
15.
Kistryn, St., E. Stephan, B. Kłos, et al.. (2006). Evidence of the Coulomb-force effects in the cross-sections of the deuteron–proton breakup at 130 MeV. Physics Letters B. 641(1). 23–27. 31 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026