Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Cost-effective control of air quality and greenhouse gases in Europe: Modeling and policy applications
2011532 citationsMarkus Amann, I. Bertok et al.Environmental Modelling & Softwareprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of I. Bertok's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I. Bertok with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I. Bertok more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by I. Bertok. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I. Bertok. The network helps show where I. Bertok may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of I. Bertok
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of I. Bertok.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of I. Bertok based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with I. Bertok. I. Bertok is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Purohit, Pallav, Lena Höglund-Isaksson, I. Bertok, Vaibhav Chaturvedi, & Manju Sharma. (2016). Scenario Analysis for HFC Emissions in India: Mitigation potential and costs.. IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis).9 indexed citations
3.
Bertok, I., Jens Borken, C. Heyes, et al.. (2015). Implications of energy trajectories from the World Energy Outlook for 2015 for India's air pollution. IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis).4 indexed citations
4.
Kiesewetter, Gregor, Jens Borken, W. Schoepp, et al.. (2013). Modelling compliance with NO2 and PM10 air quality limit values in the GAINS model. IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis).9 indexed citations
5.
Amann, Markus, I. Bertok, Jens Borken, et al.. (2013). Policy Scenarios for the revision of the thematic strategy on air pollution. IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis).15 indexed citations
Amann, Markus, I. Bertok, Jens Borken, et al.. (2012). Environmental improvements of the 2012 revision of the Gothenburg Protocol. IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis).4 indexed citations
8.
Amann, Markus, I. Bertok, Jens Borken, et al.. (2011). An Updated Set of Scenarios of Cost-effective Emission Reductions for the Revision of the Gothenburg Protocol. IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis).5 indexed citations
9.
Bertok, I., Jens Borken, Catherine Liston‐Heyes, et al.. (2011). Cost-effective emission reductions to improve air quality in Europe in 2020: Analysis of policy options for the EU for the revision of the Gothenburg Protocol. IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis).13 indexed citations
10.
Amann, Markus, I. Bertok, Jens Borken, et al.. (2011). Cost-effective control of air quality and greenhouse gases in Europe: Modeling and policy applications. Environmental Modelling & Software. 26(12). 1489–1501.532 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
Klimont, Zbigniew, Fabian Wagner, W. Schoepp, et al.. (2007). The role of agriculture in the European Commission strategy to reduce air pollution. IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis).2 indexed citations
12.
Amann, Markus, W. A. H. Asman, I. Bertok, et al.. (2007). Integrated assessment of air pollution and greenhouse gases mitigation in Europe. IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis). 259–266.4 indexed citations
13.
Amann, Markus, W. A. H. Asman, I. Bertok, et al.. (2007). Cost-optimized Reductions of Air Pollutant Emissions in the EU Member States to Address the Environmental Objectives of the Thematic Strategy on Air Pollution. IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis).6 indexed citations
14.
Klimont, Zbigniew, W. A. H. Asman, I. Bertok, et al.. (2007). Measures in Agriculture to Reduce Ammonia Emission. IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis).2 indexed citations
15.
Amann, Markus, I. Bertok, J. Cofała, et al.. (2004). Two Draft Baseline Scenarios for the Clean Air for Europe (CAFE) Program.1 indexed citations
16.
Klimont, Zbigniew, et al.. (2002). Modeling Particulate Emissions in Europe. A Framework to Estimate Reduction Potential and Control Costs. IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis).27 indexed citations
Bertok, I., Markus Amann, J. Cofała, et al.. (2001). A Framework to Estimate the Potential and Costs for the Control of Fine Particulate Emissions in Europe. IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis).24 indexed citations
19.
Amann, M.-C., I. Bertok, F. Gyárfáŝ, et al.. (1998). Integrated Assessment Modelling for the Protocol to Abate Acidification, Eutrophication and Ground-level Ozone in Europe. IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis).21 indexed citations
20.
Amann, M.-C., et al.. (1992). Strategies for Reducing Sulfur Dioxide Emissions in Europe. IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis).4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.