Hylke de Vries
- Atmospheric Science top 2%
- Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations 42
- Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research 22
- Cryospheric studies and observations 10
- Global and Planetary Change top 1%
- Climate variability and models 54
- Hydrology and Drought Analysis 6
- Flood Risk Assessment and Management 5
- Oceanography top 5%
- Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes 11
- Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing 6
- Earth-Surface Processes top 5%
- Water Science and Technology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Rein HaarsmaWilco HazelegerSybren DrijfhoutErik van MeijgaardGeert LenderinkGeert Jan van OldenborghDewi Le BarsAndreas Sterl
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited KingdomFrance
In The Last Decade
Hylke de Vries
68 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Atmospheric Science 1.2k
- Global and Planetary Change 1.3k
- Oceanography 350
- Earth-Surface Processes 139
- Water Science and Technology 98
Countries citing papers authored by Hylke de Vries
This map shows the geographic impact of Hylke de Vries's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hylke de Vries with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hylke de Vries more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hylke de Vries
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hylke de Vries. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hylke de Vries. The network helps show where Hylke de Vries may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hylke de Vries, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 10 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2025 | 4 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 7 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 7 | |
| 7 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 29 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 16 | |
| 12 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 13 | 2022 | 13 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 51 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 37 | |
| 17 | A tale of two storm: An example of a storyline approach for high-impact twin storms | 2018 | 1 |
| 18 | 2018 | 44 | |
| 19 | 2017 | 14 | |
| 20 | 2009 | 105 |
About Hylke de Vries
Hylke de Vries is a scholar working on Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change and Oceanography, having authored 69 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Climate variability and models (54 papers), Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations (42 papers), Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research (22 papers), Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes (11 papers), Cryospheric studies and observations (10 papers), Hydrology and Drought Analysis (6 papers), Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing (6 papers) and Flood Risk Assessment and Management (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atmospheric Science (1.2k citations), Global and Planetary Change (1.3k citations) and Oceanography (350 citations). Hylke de Vries has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Rein Haarsma, Wilco Hazeleger, Sybren Drijfhout, Erik van Meijgaard, Geert Lenderink, Geert Jan van Oldenborgh, Dewi Le Bars, Andreas Sterl, Tim Woollings and Nina Ridder.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.