H.W. Parker
Impact in
-
- Ichthyology and Marine Biology
- Fish Ecology and Management Studies
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Amphibian and Reptile Biology
- Marine and fisheries research
Papers in
-
- Ichthyology and Marine Biology 2
-
- Species Distribution and Climate Change 3
- Co-authors
- E. R. Dunn (1 shared paper)M. Boeseman (1 shared paper)Charles M. Bogert (1 shared paper)Renata Walewska (1 shared paper)Κώστας Σταματόπουλος (1 shared paper)John Cooper (1 shared paper)Margaret Ashton‐Key (1 shared paper)Jonathan C. Strefford (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Copeia (3 papers)Nature (2 papers)The Digital Academic Repository of Naturalis Biodiversity Center (Naturalis Biodiversity Center) (1 paper)Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Zoology (2 papers)Chesapeake Science (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNetherlandsGreece
In The Last Decade
H.W. Parker
10 papers receiving 208 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 124
- Global and Planetary Change 134
- Aquatic Science 35
- Paleontology 26
- Ecological Modeling 14
Countries citing papers authored by H.W. Parker
This map shows the geographic impact of H.W. Parker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H.W. Parker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H.W. Parker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by H.W. Parker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by H.W. Parker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H.W. Parker. The network helps show where H.W. Parker may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 13 scholars most cited alongside H.W. Parker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Age, size and vertebral calcification in the basking shark, Cetorhinus maximus (Gunnerus) | 1965 | 59 |
| 2 | 1956 | 57 | |
| 3 | 1964 | 48 | |
| 4 | 1954 | 31 | |
| 5 | 1958 | 20 | |
| 6 | 1952 | 11 | |
| 7 | 1965 | 9 | |
| 8 | 1956 | 8 | |
| 9 | 1956 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 11 | 1962 | 0 |
About H.W. Parker
H.W. Parker is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecological Modeling, Genetics, Global and Planetary Change and Social Psychology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 248 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Species Distribution and Climate Change (3 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (3 papers), Environmental and Biological Research in Conflict Zones (2 papers), Animal and Plant Science Education (2 papers), Ichthyology and Marine Biology (2 papers), Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (1 paper), Marine animal studies overview (1 paper) and Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (124 citations), Global and Planetary Change (134 citations), Aquatic Science (35 citations), Paleontology (26 citations) and Ecological Modeling (14 citations). H.W. Parker has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Greece. Frequent co-authors include E. R. Dunn, M. Boeseman, Charles M. Bogert, Renata Walewska, Κώστας Σταματόπουλος, John Cooper, Margaret Ashton‐Key, Jonathan C. Strefford, Robert Mertens and David Oscier. Their work appears in journals such as Copeia, Nature, The Digital Academic Repository of Naturalis Biodiversity Center (Naturalis Biodiversity Center), Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Zoology and Chesapeake Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.