Hung‐Ju Chen

535 citations
49 papers · 314 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Hung‐Ju Chen

45 papers receiving 292 citations

Peers

Hung‐Ju Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Economics and Econometrics 227
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 61
  • Accounting 39
  • Gender Studies 27
  • Demography 28
Replace Thibaut Lamadon with:
Thibaut Lamadon United States
Toru Kitagawa United Kingdom
C. Alan Bester United States
Johann K. Brunner Austria
Carl M. Campbell United States
Dominique Thon Norway
Ugo Trivellato Italy
Leonard Gill United Kingdom
Jean‐Marc Robin France
Barış Kaymak Canada
Hung‐Ju Chen relative to Thibaut Lamadon United States Thibaut Lamadon's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×
Thibaut Lamadon · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hung‐Ju Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hung‐Ju Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hung‐Ju Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hung‐Ju Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hung‐Ju Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hung‐Ju Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hung‐Ju Chen. The network helps show where Hung‐Ju Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Hung‐Ju Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hung‐Ju Chen Line = papers co-authored together Hung‐Ju Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200536
2 200431
3 201323
4 200822
5 200717
6 200911
7 201111
8 202111
9 201810
10 200810
11 201010
12 20119
13
THE ROLE OF FIRM SIZE IN CONTROLLING OUTPUT DECLINE DURING THE ASIAN FINANCIAL CRISIS
20057
14 20177
15 20147
16 20176
17 20116
18 20185
19 20235
20 20085

About Hung‐Ju Chen

Hung‐Ju Chen is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Accounting, Sociology and Political Science and General Health Professions, having authored 49 papers that have together received 314 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (22 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (22 papers), Economic theories and models (16 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (7 papers), Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis (5 papers), Economic Policies and Impacts (4 papers), Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (4 papers) and Global trade and economics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Economics and Econometrics (227 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (61 citations), Accounting (39 citations), Gender Studies (27 citations) and Demography (28 citations). Hung‐Ju Chen has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Ming‐Chia Li, Jang‐Ting Guo, Koichi Miyazaki, Ping Wang, Shin-Hung Lin, Ping Wang, Been-Lon Chen, Chia-Jen Chang, Alessandro Spelta and Donald Lien. Their work appears in journals such as Economic Modelling, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Macroeconomic Dynamics, Journal of Economics and Economic Inquiry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact