Hung‐Chih Hung

429 citations
14 papers · 327 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Hung‐Chih Hung

14 papers receiving 322 citations

Peers

Hung‐Chih Hung
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Global and Planetary Change 201
  • Sociology and Political Science 216
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 36
  • Atmospheric Science 50
  • General Decision Sciences 5
Replace Wouter Vanneuville with:
Wouter Vanneuville Belgium
Robert Šakić Trogrlić United Kingdom
Mark Fleischhauer Germany
Keith Smith United Kingdom
Wendy Saunders New Zealand
Alexandru Gavriș Romania
A. de Jong Netherlands
I Frigerio Italy
Zuzana Stanton-Geddes United States
Antje Otto Germany
Hung‐Chih Hung relative to Wouter Vanneuville Belgium Wouter Vanneuville's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Wouter Vanneuville · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hung‐Chih Hung

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hung‐Chih Hung's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hung‐Chih Hung with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hung‐Chih Hung more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hung‐Chih Hung

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hung‐Chih Hung. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hung‐Chih Hung. The network helps show where Hung‐Chih Hung may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Hung‐Chih Hung, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hung‐Chih Hung Line = papers co-authored together Hung‐Chih Hung links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 201590
2 200971
3 201040
4 201335
5 201318
6 202016
7 201816
8 200715
9 202415
10 20093
11 20162
12 20242
13 20132
14
AN APPLICATION OF EARTHQUAKE RISK-BENEFIT ANALYSIS IN LAND USE PLANNING: USING HAZ-TAIWAN SYSTEM
20022

About Hung‐Chih Hung

Hung‐Chih Hung is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, Atmospheric Science and Civil and Structural Engineering, having authored 14 papers that have together received 327 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Flood Risk Assessment and Management (11 papers), Disaster Management and Resilience (7 papers), Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research (3 papers), Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis (2 papers), Regional resilience and development (2 papers), Risk Perception and Management (2 papers), Housing Market and Economics (1 paper) and Risk and Safety Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (201 citations), Sociology and Political Science (216 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (36 citations), Atmospheric Science (50 citations) and General Decision Sciences (5 citations). Hung‐Chih Hung has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Yi‐Chung Liu, Liang‐Chun Chen, Yuting Lü, Suying Chen, Yijie Chen, Chunkuan Shih, Ming‐Huei Chen and Yi-Ching Lin. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Risk Research, Disasters, Land Use Policy, Climate Risk Management and Nuclear Engineering and Design.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact