Huipeng Ge
About
In The Last Decade
Huipeng Ge
10 papers receiving 494 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 112
- Infectious Diseases 244
- Neurology 111
- Clinical Psychology 74
- Oncology 57
- Epidemiology 48
Countries citing papers authored by Huipeng Ge
This map shows the geographic impact of Huipeng Ge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Huipeng Ge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Huipeng Ge more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Huipeng Ge
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Huipeng Ge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Huipeng Ge. The network helps show where Huipeng Ge may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Huipeng Ge
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Huipeng Ge. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Huipeng Ge based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Huipeng Ge. Huipeng Ge is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 26 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 44 | |
| 12 | The epidemiology and clinical information about COVID-19 breakdown → | 440 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.