Hugo Lacombe
About
In The Last Decade
Hugo Lacombe
9 papers receiving 218 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 134
- Biomedical Engineering 119
- Immunology 52
- Transplantation 31
- Surgery 19
Countries citing papers authored by Hugo Lacombe
This map shows the geographic impact of Hugo Lacombe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hugo Lacombe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hugo Lacombe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hugo Lacombe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hugo Lacombe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hugo Lacombe. The network helps show where Hugo Lacombe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hugo Lacombe
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hugo Lacombe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hugo Lacombe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hugo Lacombe. Hugo Lacombe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11 | |
| 2 | 10 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 21 | |
| 7 | 15 | |
| 8 | 61 | |
| 9 | 90 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.