Hugh Stephens

860 total citations · 1 hit paper
5 papers, 592 citations indexed

About

Hugh Stephens is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Health and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Hugh Stephens has authored 5 papers receiving a total of 592 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in General Health Professions, 2 papers in Health and 2 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Hugh Stephens's work include Digital Mental Health Interventions (2 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (2 papers) and Social Media in Health Education (2 papers). Hugh Stephens is often cited by papers focused on Digital Mental Health Interventions (2 papers), Mobile Health and mHealth Applications (2 papers) and Social Media in Health Education (2 papers). Hugh Stephens collaborates with scholars based in Australia, New Zealand and United States. Hugh Stephens's co-authors include Fiona H. McKay, Annemarie Wright, Jane Shill, Christina Cheng, Stewart G. Morrison, David Pilcher, Michael Bailey, Andrew Perry, Aaron H. J. Withers and Edwina C. Moore and has published in prestigious journals such as The Medical Journal of Australia, JMIR mhealth and uhealth and The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care.

In The Last Decade

Hugh Stephens

5 papers receiving 576 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Evaluating mobile phone applications for health behaviour change: A systematic review

2016 282 citations Fiona H. McKay, Christina Cheng et al. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Hugh Stephens Australia	5	347	159	133	115	86	5	592
Christina Cheng Australia	13	623 1.8×	123 0.8×	146 1.1×	117 1.0×	102 1.2×	26	844
Chaitali Sinha Canada	5	357 1.0×	152 1.0×	38 0.3×	103 0.9×	39 0.5×	12	523
Astrid Torbjørnsen Norway	13	500 1.4×	154 1.0×	57 0.4×	120 1.0×	70 0.8×	29	776
Emee Vida Estacio United Kingdom	11	424 1.2×	50 0.3×	103 0.8×	81 0.7×	62 0.7×	16	667
Adriana Arcia United States	13	301 0.9×	39 0.2×	67 0.5×	94 0.8×	61 0.7×	44	514
Jane Shill Australia	8	321 0.9×	159 1.0×	31 0.2×	167 1.5×	54 0.6×	10	608
Eva Serhal Canada	7	393 1.1×	99 0.6×	55 0.4×	320 2.8×	67 0.8×	10	721
Antonia Arnaert Canada	14	241 0.7×	62 0.4×	39 0.3×	198 1.7×	43 0.5×	50	517
Kim Watts United Kingdom	14	365 1.1×	96 0.6×	128 1.0×	290 2.5×	68 0.8×	31	996
José Betancourt United States	11	264 0.8×	59 0.4×	43 0.3×	138 1.2×	90 1.0×	22	627

Countries citing papers authored by Hugh Stephens

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hugh Stephens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hugh Stephens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hugh Stephens more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hugh Stephens

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hugh Stephens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hugh Stephens. The network helps show where Hugh Stephens may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hugh Stephens

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hugh Stephens. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hugh Stephens based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hugh Stephens. Hugh Stephens is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

5 of 5 papers shown

1.

McKay, Fiona H., et al.. (2019). Using Health and Well-Being Apps for Behavior Change: A Systematic Search and Rating of Apps. JMIR mhealth and uhealth. 7(7). e11926–e11926. 125 indexed citations

2.

McKay, Fiona H., et al.. (2016). Evaluating mobile phone applications for health behaviour change: A systematic review. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare. 24(1). 22–30. 282 indexed citations breakdown →

3.

Morrison, Stewart G., et al.. (2015). Unprofessional behaviour on social media by medical students. The Medical Journal of Australia. 203(11). 439–439. 52 indexed citations

4.

Moore, Edwina C., David Pilcher, Michael Bailey, Hugh Stephens, & Heather Cleland. (2013). The Burns Evaluation and Mortality Study (BEAMS). The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care. 75(2). 298–303. 45 indexed citations

5.

Morrison, Stewart G., et al.. (2011). Social media and the medical profession. The Medical Journal of Australia. 194(12). 642–644. 88 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact