Hugh Musick
About
In The Last Decade
Hugh Musick
6 papers receiving 46 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 18
- General Health Professions 15
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 13
- Ophthalmology 11
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 8
Countries citing papers authored by Hugh Musick
This map shows the geographic impact of Hugh Musick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hugh Musick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hugh Musick more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hugh Musick
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hugh Musick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hugh Musick. The network helps show where Hugh Musick may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hugh Musick
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hugh Musick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hugh Musick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hugh Musick. Hugh Musick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 11 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.