Hugh James Freeman
- Epidemiology top 1%
- Surgery top 1%
- Gastroenterology top 0.1%
- Genetics top 1%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Young S. KimHelen GillettDavid OwenBrian ChiuRobert WolberGene A. SpillerGary A. QuammeWilfred M. Weinstein
- Topics
- Microscopic Colitis (106 papers)Celiac Disease Research and Management (96 papers)Inflammatory Bowel Disease (48 papers)
- Cited by
- GastroenterologyEpidemiologyGenetics
- Journals
- The LancetJournal of Clinical InvestigationSHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesRomania
In The Last Decade
Hugh James Freeman
242 papers receiving 5.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
- Epidemiology 2.5k
- Surgery 2.3k
- Gastroenterology 2.0k
- Genetics 1.5k
- Molecular Biology 561
Countries citing papers authored by Hugh James Freeman
This map shows the geographic impact of Hugh James Freeman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hugh James Freeman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hugh James Freeman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hugh James Freeman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hugh James Freeman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hugh James Freeman. The network helps show where Hugh James Freeman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hugh James Freeman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hugh James Freeman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hugh James Freeman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hugh James Freeman. Hugh James Freeman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | 39 | |
| 12 | 25 | |
| 13 | 31 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 90 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 35 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 22 | |
| 20 | A double-blind study on the effect of purified cellulose dietary fiber on 1,2-dimethylhydrazine-induced rat colonic neoplasia. | 85 |
About Hugh James Freeman
Hugh James Freeman is a scholar working on Gastroenterology, Epidemiology and Genetics, having authored 258 papers that have together received 5.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Microscopic Colitis (106 papers), Celiac Disease Research and Management (96 papers) and Inflammatory Bowel Disease (48 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gastroenterology (2.0k citations), Epidemiology (2.5k citations) and Genetics (1.5k citations). Hugh James Freeman has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Romania. Frequent co-authors include Young S. Kim, Helen Gillett, David Owen, Brian Chiu, Robert Wolber, Gene A. Spiller, Gary A. Quamme, Wilfred M. Weinstein, Theodor K. Shnitka and Reuben Lotan. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Journal of Clinical Investigation and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.