Hope M. Williams
- Anthropology top 0.5%
- Paleontology top 2%
- Archeology top 1%
- Atmospheric Science top 10%
- Archeology top 0.5%
- Co-authors
- Tom MinichilloJocelyn BernatchezZenobia JacobsErich C. FisherAndy I.R. HerriesPeter NilssenMiryam Bar‐MatthewsPanagiotis Karkanas
- Topics
- Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (6 papers)Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (6 papers)Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (4 papers)
- Cited by
- ArcheologyPaleontologyAnthropology
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth AfricaAustralia
In The Last Decade
Hope M. Williams
7 papers receiving 862 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Anthropology 646
- Paleontology 549
- Archeology 283
- Atmospheric Science 235
- Archeology 175
Countries citing papers authored by Hope M. Williams
This map shows the geographic impact of Hope M. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hope M. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hope M. Williams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hope M. Williams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hope M. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hope M. Williams. The network helps show where Hope M. Williams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hope M. Williams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hope M. Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hope M. Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hope M. Williams. Hope M. Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | |
| 2 | Stable Isotope Analysis of Archaeological and Modern Micromammals from the Greater Cape Floristic Region near Pinnacle Point, on the South Coast of South Africa | 7 |
| 3 | A high resolution and continuous isotopic speleothem record of paleoclimate and paleoenvironment from 90-53 ka from the south coast of South Africa | 1 |
| 4 | 55 | |
| 5 | 82 | |
| 6 | 155 | |
| 7 | Early human use of marine resources and pigment in South Africa during the Middle Pleistocenebreakdown → | 628 |
About Hope M. Williams
Hope M. Williams is a scholar working on Archeology, Paleontology and Anthropology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 937 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (6 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (6 papers) and Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Archeology (175 citations), Paleontology (549 citations) and Anthropology (646 citations). Hope M. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Africa and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Tom Minichillo, Jocelyn Bernatchez, Zenobia Jacobs, Erich C. Fisher, Andy I.R. Herries, Peter Nilssen, Miryam Bar‐Matthews, Panagiotis Karkanas, Ian Watts and Antonieta Jerardino. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Quaternary Science Reviews and Journal of Archaeological Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.