Hong‐Can Liu
About
In The Last Decade
Hong‐Can Liu
130 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
- Molecular Biology 1.6k
- Ecology 1.3k
- Plant Science 355
- Biotechnology 289
- Pharmacology 166
Countries citing papers authored by Hong‐Can Liu
This map shows the geographic impact of Hong‐Can Liu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hong‐Can Liu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hong‐Can Liu more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hong‐Can Liu
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hong‐Can Liu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hong‐Can Liu. The network helps show where Hong‐Can Liu may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hong‐Can Liu
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hong‐Can Liu. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hong‐Can Liu based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hong‐Can Liu. Hong‐Can Liu is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 34 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 24 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 17 | |
| 13 | 17 | |
| 14 | 18 | |
| 15 | 29 | |
| 16 | 11 | |
| 17 | 12 | |
| 18 | 10 | |
| 19 | 15 | |
| 20 | 70 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.