This map shows the geographic impact of Hong Jiang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hong Jiang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hong Jiang more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hong Jiang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hong Jiang. The network helps show where Hong Jiang may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hong Jiang
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hong Jiang.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hong Jiang based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Hong Jiang. Hong Jiang is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Zhu, Rongrong, et al.. (2015). [The prevalence of appositional angle closure among adults aged 50 years or above in Funing county Jiangsu Province].. PubMed. 51(7). 487–92.
Wang, Jianhua, Hong Jiang, Xinjie Mao, & Wentao Yan. (2015). Quantitative analysis of microvascular network of the lid wiper area in contact lens wearers. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 56(7). 6068–6068.1 indexed citations
Jiang, Hong. (2008). Application of Ecospace Model in Evaluating Marine Protected Areas. World Sci-tech R & D.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.