Holger Scheel

1.6k total citations · 1 hit paper
7 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Holger Scheel is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research and Organic Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Holger Scheel has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 2 papers in Management Science and Operations Research and 1 paper in Organic Chemistry. Recurrent topics in Holger Scheel's work include Efficiency Analysis Using DEA (2 papers), Economic theories and models (2 papers) and Optimization and Variational Analysis (1 paper). Holger Scheel is often cited by papers focused on Efficiency Analysis Using DEA (2 papers), Economic theories and models (2 papers) and Optimization and Variational Analysis (1 paper). Holger Scheel collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Slovakia. Holger Scheel's co-authors include Stefan Scholtes, Florian Winter, Klaus Eichele, Rainer Pöttgen, Lars Wesemann and Hermann A. Mayer and has published in prestigious journals such as European Journal of Operational Research, Operations Research and Dalton Transactions.

In The Last Decade

Holger Scheel

7 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Undesirable outputs in efficiency valuations

2001 613 citations Holger Scheel European Journal of Operational Research profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Holger Scheel Germany	7	641	446	356	304	275	7	1.2k
Majid Soleimani-damaneh Iran	20	810 1.3×	260 0.6×	500 1.4×	483 1.6×	318 1.2×	110	1.4k
Yuri Ermoliev Austria	16	287 0.4×	188 0.4×	110 0.3×	106 0.3×	58 0.2×	33	795
Agha Iqbal Ali United States	14	841 1.3×	420 0.9×	50 0.1×	199 0.7×	30 0.1×	32	1.2k
Ying Ji China	21	408 0.6×	145 0.3×	199 0.6×	165 0.5×	106 0.4×	113	1.3k
Mariano Luque Spain	20	459 0.7×	118 0.3×	450 1.3×	282 0.9×	22 0.1×	62	1.3k
Julia L. Higle United States	15	616 1.0×	135 0.3×	151 0.4×	373 1.2×	82 0.3×	33	1.2k
Enriqueta Vercher Spain	20	853 1.3×	155 0.3×	143 0.4×	211 0.7×	91 0.3×	43	1.3k
V. I. Norkin Ukraine	13	410 0.6×	102 0.2×	168 0.5×	184 0.6×	91 0.3×	61	836
Aparna Mehra India	19	518 0.8×	132 0.3×	326 0.9×	269 0.9×	133 0.5×	67	947
Yves Smeers Belgium	27	383 0.6×	683 1.5×	177 0.5×	302 1.0×	104 0.4×	112	3.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Holger Scheel

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Holger Scheel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Holger Scheel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Holger Scheel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Holger Scheel

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Holger Scheel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Holger Scheel. The network helps show where Holger Scheel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Holger Scheel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Holger Scheel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Holger Scheel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Holger Scheel. Holger Scheel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Scheel, Holger, Klaus Eichele, Hermann A. Mayer, et al.. (2014). Dinuclear copper complexes: coordination of Group 14 heteroborates. Dalton Transactions. 43(31). 11867–11876. 11 indexed citations

2.

Scheel, Holger & Stefan Scholtes. (2003). Continuity of DEA Efficiency Measures. Operations Research. 51(1). 149–159. 26 indexed citations

3.

Scheel, Holger. (2001). Undesirable outputs in efficiency valuations. European Journal of Operational Research. 132(2). 400–410. 613 indexed citations breakdown →

4.

Scheel, Holger. (2000). Effizienzmaße der Data Envelopment Analysis. Deutscher Universitätsverlag eBooks. 11 indexed citations

5.

Scheel, Holger & Stefan Scholtes. (2000). Mathematical Programs with Complementarity Constraints: Stationarity, Optimality, and Sensitivity. Mathematics of Operations Research. 25(1). 1–22. 495 indexed citations

6.

Scheel, Holger. (2000). EMS: Efficiency Measurement System User’s Manual. 47 indexed citations

7.

Scheel, Holger & Stefan Scholtes. (1997). Mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints Stationarity, optimality, and sensitivity. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique). 39 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact