Holger Scheel
Impact in
-
- Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
- Numerical Analysis top 2%
- Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Economic theories and models 2
- Economic Growth and Productivity 1
-
- Efficiency Analysis Using DEA 2
- Co-authors
- Stefan Scholtes (3 shared papers)Lars Wesemann (1 shared paper)Florian Winter (1 shared paper)Klaus Eichele (1 shared paper)Rainer Pöttgen (1 shared paper)Hermann A. Mayer (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Dalton Transactions (1 paper)European Journal of Operational Research (1 paper)Mathematics of Operations Research (1 paper)Operations Research (1 paper)OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited KingdomSlovakia
In The Last Decade
Holger Scheel
7 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Management Science and Operations Research 641
- Numerical Analysis 275
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 356
- Economics and Econometrics 446
- Environmental Engineering 221
Countries citing papers authored by Holger Scheel
This map shows the geographic impact of Holger Scheel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Holger Scheel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Holger Scheel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Holger Scheel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Holger Scheel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Holger Scheel. The network helps show where Holger Scheel may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 6 scholars most cited alongside Holger Scheel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Undesirable outputs in efficiency valuations Hit paper breakdown → | 2001 | 613 |
| 2 | 2000 | 495 | |
| 3 | EMS: Efficiency Measurement System User’s Manual | 2000 | 47 |
| 4 | Mathematical programs with equilibrium constraints Stationarity, optimality, and sensitivity | 1997 | 39 |
| 5 | 2003 | 26 | |
| 6 | 2000 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 11 |
About Holger Scheel
Holger Scheel is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research, Organic Chemistry, Numerical Analysis and Control and Systems Engineering, having authored 7 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic theories and models (2 papers), Efficiency Analysis Using DEA (2 papers), Magnetism in coordination complexes (1 paper), Economic Growth and Productivity (1 paper), Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research (1 paper), Optimization and Mathematical Programming (1 paper), Monetary Policy and Economic Impact (1 paper) and Metal complexes synthesis and properties (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (641 citations), Numerical Analysis (275 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (356 citations), Economics and Econometrics (446 citations) and Environmental Engineering (221 citations). Holger Scheel has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Slovakia. Frequent co-authors include Stefan Scholtes, Lars Wesemann, Florian Winter, Klaus Eichele, Rainer Pöttgen and Hermann A. Mayer. Their work appears in journals such as Dalton Transactions, European Journal of Operational Research, Mathematics of Operations Research, Operations Research and OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.