Holger Ebel

1.8k total citations · 1 hit paper
5 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Holger Ebel is a scholar working on Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Computer Networks and Communications and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Holger Ebel has authored 5 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, 2 papers in Computer Networks and Communications and 2 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Holger Ebel's work include Complex Network Analysis Techniques (4 papers), Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (3 papers) and Peer-to-Peer Network Technologies (2 papers). Holger Ebel is often cited by papers focused on Complex Network Analysis Techniques (4 papers), Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence (3 papers) and Peer-to-Peer Network Technologies (2 papers). Holger Ebel collaborates with scholars based in Germany and Canada. Holger Ebel's co-authors include Stefan Bornholdt and Jörn Davidsen and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Complexity and Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

In The Last Decade

Holger Ebel

5 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Scale-free topology of e-mail networks

2002 541 citations Holger Ebel, Stefan Bornholdt et al. Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Holger Ebel Germany	5	773	375	201	157	103	5	1.1k
Run-Ran Liu China	22	632 0.8×	394 1.1×	200 1.0×	174 1.1×	137 1.3×	67	1.2k
Guilherme Ferraz de Arruda Spain	16	865 1.1×	313 0.8×	225 1.1×	96 0.6×	125 1.2×	28	1.4k
Clara Granell Spain	13	1.4k 1.8×	287 0.8×	272 1.4×	63 0.4×	62 0.6×	24	1.9k
Flaviano Morone United States	14	947 1.2×	221 0.6×	243 1.2×	35 0.2×	161 1.6×	29	1.4k
Shi‐Min Cai China	18	822 1.1×	154 0.4×	165 0.8×	24 0.2×	169 1.6×	113	1.3k
G. J. Baxter Portugal	14	612 0.8×	125 0.3×	145 0.7×	41 0.3×	131 1.3×	23	1.0k
A. N. Samukhin Russia	13	1.3k 1.6×	144 0.4×	244 1.2×	31 0.2×	69 0.7×	23	1.6k
Giulio Cimini Italy	17	589 0.8×	180 0.5×	79 0.4×	41 0.3×	121 1.2×	47	1.2k
Luo-Luo Jiang China	16	344 0.4×	808 2.2×	112 0.6×	481 3.1×	36 0.3×	41	1.2k
Xiu‐Xiu Zhan China	13	672 0.9×	144 0.4×	115 0.6×	25 0.2×	119 1.2×	33	844

Countries citing papers authored by Holger Ebel

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Holger Ebel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Holger Ebel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Holger Ebel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Holger Ebel

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Holger Ebel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Holger Ebel. The network helps show where Holger Ebel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Holger Ebel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Holger Ebel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Holger Ebel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Holger Ebel. Holger Ebel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

5 of 5 papers shown

1.

Ebel, Holger & Stefan Bornholdt. (2002). Coevolutionary games on networks. Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics. 66(5). 56118–56118. 204 indexed citations

2.

Ebel, Holger, et al.. (2002). Scale-free topology of e-mail networks. Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics. 66(3). 35103–35103. 541 indexed citations breakdown →

3.

Davidsen, Jörn, Holger Ebel, & Stefan Bornholdt. (2002). Emergence of a Small World from Local Interactions: Modeling Acquaintance Networks. Physical Review Letters. 88(12). 128701–128701. 200 indexed citations

4.

Ebel, Holger, Jörn Davidsen, & Stefan Bornholdt. (2002). Dynamics of social networks. Complexity. 8(2). 24–27. 70 indexed citations

5.

Bornholdt, Stefan & Holger Ebel. (2001). World Wide Web scaling exponent from Simon’s 1955 model. Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics. 64(3). 35104–35104. 83 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact