Hoda Anton Culver
About
In The Last Decade
Hoda Anton Culver
6 papers receiving 274 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Oncology 142
- Dermatology 135
- Cell Biology 89
- Molecular Biology 58
- Cancer Research 41
Countries citing papers authored by Hoda Anton Culver
This map shows the geographic impact of Hoda Anton Culver's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hoda Anton Culver with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hoda Anton Culver more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hoda Anton Culver
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hoda Anton Culver. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hoda Anton Culver. The network helps show where Hoda Anton Culver may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hoda Anton Culver
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hoda Anton Culver. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hoda Anton Culver based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hoda Anton Culver. Hoda Anton Culver is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | |
| 2 | 34 | |
| 3 | 14 | |
| 4 | 88 | |
| 5 | 43 | |
| 6 | 86 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.