H.-O. Peitgen

1.9k citations
32 papers · 1.2k indexed · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

H.-O. Peitgen

31 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

H.-O. Peitgen
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
  • Hepatology 300
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 116
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 356
  • Surgery 407
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 188
Replace Tobias Preußer with:
Tobias Preußer Germany
Ivo Wolf Germany
Homer Pien United States
Stephan Zidowitz Germany
Volker Dicken Germany
Atilla P. Kiraly United States
De-Xing Kong China
Martin Seebaß Germany
Alfred M. Franz Germany
Jong Beom South Korea
H.-O. Peitgen relative to Tobias Preußer Germany Tobias Preußer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
Tobias Preußer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by H.-O. Peitgen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H.-O. Peitgen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H.-O. Peitgen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H.-O. Peitgen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H.-O. Peitgen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H.-O. Peitgen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H.-O. Peitgen. The network helps show where H.-O. Peitgen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside H.-O. Peitgen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with H.-O. Peitgen Line = papers co-authored together H.-O. Peitgen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201352
2 201212
3 201120
4 201077
5 200913
6 200927
7 20099
8 200788
9 200713
10 20076
11 200535
12
Anatomical and physiological comparison of liver volumes among three frequent types of parenchyma transection in live donor liver transplantation.
20058
13 200529
14 20046
15 20033
16 200225
17 200173
18 200110
19 199868
20 1988167

About H.-O. Peitgen

H.-O. Peitgen is a scholar working on Hepatology, Computational Mathematics, Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, Surgery and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 32 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (10 papers), Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (9 papers), Liver Disease and Transplantation (7 papers), Medical Image Segmentation Techniques (4 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (4 papers), Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies (4 papers), Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (3 papers) and Organ Donation and Transplantation (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hepatology (300 citations), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (116 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (356 citations), Surgery (407 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (188 citations). H.-O. Peitgen has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Dirk Selle, Bernhard Preim, Andrea Schenk, Péter Richter, Stephen M. Wilson, Horst K. Hahn, Jean Fasel, Holger Bourquain, Ernesto P. Molmenti and Massimo Malagò. Their work appears in journals such as Surgery, Journal of Hepatology, Leonardo, International Journal of Colorectal Disease and Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026