Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The ecophysiology of seed persistence: a mechanistic view of the journey to germination or demise
2014367 citationsR.L. Long, Michael Renton et al.Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Societyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Hillary Cherry
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Hillary Cherry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hillary Cherry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hillary Cherry more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hillary Cherry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hillary Cherry. The network helps show where Hillary Cherry may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hillary Cherry
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hillary Cherry.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hillary Cherry based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Hillary Cherry. Hillary Cherry is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hamilton, Mark A., Hillary Cherry, & Peter J. Turner. (2015). Hawkweed eradication from NSW: could this be 'the first'?. Plant protection quarterly. 30(3). 110–115.7 indexed citations
6.
Long, R.L., Michael Renton, J. K. Scott, et al.. (2014). The ecophysiology of seed persistence: a mechanistic view of the journey to germination or demise. Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 90(1). 31–59.367 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Hamilton, Mark A., et al.. (2014). Using Weed Risk Management assessments to inform on-ground action for new and emerging environmental weeds in New South Wales. Charles Sturt University Research Output (CRO). 269–272.3 indexed citations
8.
Cherry, Hillary, et al.. (2013). Benefits of national weed initiatives for New South Wales: successes and future opportunities.. Plant protection quarterly. 28(3). 68.1 indexed citations
9.
Hamilton, Mark A., et al.. (2012). Changes in the distribution and density of bitou bush (Chrysanthemoides monilifera subsp. rotundata (DC.) T.Norl.) in eastern Australia.. Plant protection quarterly. 27(1). 23–30.5 indexed citations
10.
Cherry, Hillary, et al.. (2008). Bitou Bush and Boneseed Eradication and Containment in Australia. Plant protection quarterly. 23(1). 38.9 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.