Hideyuki Fusamoto
- Hepatology top 0.1%
- Epidemiology top 0.5%
- Surgery top 2%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Rheumatology top 1%
- Co-authors
- Takenobu KamadaNorio HayashiAkinori KasaharaHideki HagiwaraEiji MitaSunao KawanoKazuhiro KatayamaMasafumi Naito
- Topics
- Hepatitis C virus research (57 papers)Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (56 papers)Hepatitis B Virus Studies (46 papers)
- Journals
- New England Journal of MedicineJournal of Biological ChemistryJournal of Clinical Investigation
- Partner nations
- JapanUnited StatesArgentina
In The Last Decade
Hideyuki Fusamoto
180 papers receiving 5.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
- Hepatology 3.4k
- Epidemiology 2.9k
- Surgery 1.2k
- Molecular Biology 962
- Rheumatology 600
Countries citing papers authored by Hideyuki Fusamoto
This map shows the geographic impact of Hideyuki Fusamoto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hideyuki Fusamoto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hideyuki Fusamoto more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hideyuki Fusamoto
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hideyuki Fusamoto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hideyuki Fusamoto. The network helps show where Hideyuki Fusamoto may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hideyuki Fusamoto
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hideyuki Fusamoto. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hideyuki Fusamoto based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hideyuki Fusamoto. Hideyuki Fusamoto is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 61 | |
| 3 | 76 | |
| 4 | 53 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 18 | |
| 8 | 55 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | A CASE OF GASTRIC CANDIDIASIS COMPLICATING LEIOMYOMA OF THE STOMACH : SUCCESSFUL TREATMENT BY ENDOSCOPIC INJECTION THERAPY WITH MICONAZOLE | 1 |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | 0 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 12 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Hideyuki Fusamoto
Hideyuki Fusamoto is a scholar working on Hepatology, Gastroenterology and Epidemiology, having authored 188 papers that have together received 5.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hepatitis C virus research (57 papers), Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (56 papers) and Hepatitis B Virus Studies (46 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hepatology (3.4k citations), Epidemiology (2.9k citations) and Gastroenterology (248 citations). Hideyuki Fusamoto has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, United States and Argentina. Frequent co-authors include Takenobu Kamada, Norio Hayashi, Akinori Kasahara, Hideki Hagiwara, Eiji Mita, Sunao Kawano, Kazuhiro Katayama, Masafumi Naito, Shingo Tsuji and Masahide Oshita. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Journal of Clinical Investigation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.