Hermann Swart

1.7k total citations · 1 hit paper
16 papers, 981 citations indexed

About

Hermann Swart is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Gender Studies. According to data from OpenAlex, Hermann Swart has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 981 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 7 papers in Social Psychology and 5 papers in Gender Studies. Recurrent topics in Hermann Swart's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (11 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (5 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (4 papers). Hermann Swart is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (11 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (5 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (4 papers). Hermann Swart collaborates with scholars based in South Africa, United Kingdom and Germany. Hermann Swart's co-authors include Miles Hewstone, Oliver Christ, Alberto Voci, Ananthi Al Ramiah, Simon Lolliot, Katharina Schmid, Nicole Tausch, Dietlind Stolle, Steven Vertovec and Ulrich Wagner and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology and American Psychologist.

In The Last Decade

Hermann Swart

15 papers receiving 939 citations

Hit Papers

Contextual effect of positive intergroup contact on outgr... 2014 2026 2018 2022 2014 50 100 150 200 250

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Hermann Swart South Africa 10 792 434 179 92 82 16 981
Ananthi Al Ramiah United Kingdom 16 971 1.2× 507 1.2× 162 0.9× 109 1.2× 56 0.7× 20 1.2k
Andrew L. Stewart United States 11 799 1.0× 495 1.1× 240 1.3× 84 0.9× 39 0.5× 21 1.1k
Anja Eller United Kingdom 14 905 1.1× 634 1.5× 203 1.1× 74 0.8× 40 0.5× 19 1.1k
Anna Kende Hungary 21 964 1.2× 458 1.1× 189 1.1× 82 0.9× 146 1.8× 72 1.2k
Phia S. Salter United States 13 782 1.0× 347 0.8× 154 0.9× 65 0.7× 74 0.9× 39 1.0k
Jasper Van Assche Belgium 20 594 0.8× 429 1.0× 89 0.5× 110 1.2× 30 0.4× 57 889
Tania Tam United Kingdom 10 724 0.9× 541 1.2× 124 0.7× 38 0.4× 51 0.6× 11 894
Nikhil K. Sengupta New Zealand 15 595 0.8× 386 0.9× 82 0.5× 86 0.9× 37 0.5× 28 770
Sjoerd F. Pennekamp Netherlands 6 996 1.3× 679 1.6× 144 0.8× 66 0.7× 74 0.9× 8 1.4k
Kristjen B. Lundberg United States 10 522 0.7× 370 0.9× 96 0.5× 101 1.1× 50 0.6× 16 828

Countries citing papers authored by Hermann Swart

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hermann Swart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hermann Swart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hermann Swart more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hermann Swart

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hermann Swart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hermann Swart. The network helps show where Hermann Swart may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hermann Swart

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hermann Swart. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hermann Swart based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hermann Swart. Hermann Swart is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
1.
Assche, Jasper Van, et al.. (2024). ‘It always seems impossible, until it is done’: Perspectives on reconciliation and its underlying processes in post‐conflict societies. European Journal of Social Psychology. 54(5). 1015–1021.
2.
Dierckx, Kim, et al.. (2023). The irony of fairness: How procedural fairness climate perceptions can hinder disadvantaged group members’ support for social change. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. 27(3). 689–710. 3 indexed citations
3.
Assche, Jasper Van, Hermann Swart, Katharina Schmid, et al.. (2023). Intergroup contact is reliably associated with reduced prejudice, even in the face of group threat and discrimination.. American Psychologist. 78(6). 761–774. 43 indexed citations
4.
Swart, Hermann, et al.. (2022). Perceived diversity, threat, and attitudes towards immigrants: the mitigating role of cross-group friendships and empathy. South African Journal of Psychology. 53(1). 44–56. 1 indexed citations
5.
Rupar, Mirjana, et al.. (2021). The generalization of intergroup contact effects: Emerging research, policy relevance, and future directions. Journal of Social Issues. 77(1). 105–131. 63 indexed citations
6.
Teye‐Kwadjo, Enoch, Ashraf Kagee, & Hermann Swart. (2018). Does Past Condom Use Moderate the Future Condom Use Intention-Behavior Relationship? Results from a Ghanaian Sample. The Journal of Psychology. 152(6). 325–340. 6 indexed citations
7.
Teye‐Kwadjo, Enoch, Ashraf Kagee, & Hermann Swart. (2017). Condom use negotiation among high school adolescents in Ghana: the role of gender. South African Journal of Psychology. 48(4). 465–475. 9 indexed citations
8.
Teye‐Kwadjo, Enoch, Ashraf Kagee, & Hermann Swart. (2017). Determinants of condom use among heterosexual young men and women in southeastern Ghana: a mediation analysis. Psychology and Sexuality. 8(4). 291–305. 15 indexed citations
9.
Teye‐Kwadjo, Enoch, Ashraf Kagee, & Hermann Swart. (2016). Predicting the Intention to Use Condoms and Actual Condom Use Behaviour: A Three‐Wave Longitudinal Study in Ghana. Applied Psychology Health and Well-Being. 9(1). 81–105. 19 indexed citations
10.
Voci, Alberto, Miles Hewstone, Hermann Swart, & Chiara A. Veneziani. (2015). Refining the association between intergroup contact and intergroup forgiveness in Northern Ireland: Type of contact, prior conflict experience, and group identification. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. 18(5). 589–608. 30 indexed citations
11.
Hewstone, Miles, Simon Lolliot, Hermann Swart, et al.. (2014). Intergroup contact and intergroup conflict.. Peace and Conflict Journal of Peace Psychology. 20(1). 39–53. 75 indexed citations
12.
Christ, Oliver, Katharina Schmid, Simon Lolliot, et al.. (2014). Contextual effect of positive intergroup contact on outgroup prejudice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 111(11). 3996–4000. 250 indexed citations breakdown →
13.
Swart, Hermann, Miles Hewstone, Oliver Christ, & Alberto Voci. (2011). Affective mediators of intergroup contact: A three-wave longitudinal study in South Africa.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 101(6). 1221–1238. 224 indexed citations
14.
Hewstone, Miles & Hermann Swart. (2011). Fifty‐odd years of inter‐group contact: From hypothesis to integrated theory. British Journal of Social Psychology. 50(3). 374–386. 197 indexed citations
15.
Swart, Hermann, Rhiannon N. Turner, Miles Hewstone, & Alberto Voci. (2011). Achieving outgroup forgiveness and outgroup trust: The importance of cross-group friendships, self-disclosure, and empathy.. Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast). 181–200. 2 indexed citations
16.
Swart, Hermann, Miles Hewstone, Oliver Christ, & Alberto Voci. (2010). The Impact of Crossgroup Friendships in South Africa: Affective Mediators and Multigroup Comparisons. Journal of Social Issues. 66(2). 309–333. 44 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026