Herbert Steiner

1.5k total citations
8 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Herbert Steiner is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Pharmacology. According to data from OpenAlex, Herbert Steiner has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 3 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 2 papers in Pharmacology. Recurrent topics in Herbert Steiner's work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (5 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers). Herbert Steiner is often cited by papers focused on Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (5 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (3 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers). Herbert Steiner collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Germany. Herbert Steiner's co-authors include Cynthia H.Y. Fu, Jan Scott, Sergi G. Costafreda, Katharine A. Rimes, Janet Wingrove, Edward Watkins, Eugene Mullan, Yanni Malliaris, Michelle L. Moulds and John Suckling and has published in prestigious journals such as Biological Psychiatry, The British Journal of Psychiatry and Psychological Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Herbert Steiner

8 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Herbert Steiner United Kingdom 6 697 435 417 216 158 8 1.1k
Yoshihiko Kunisato Japan 18 440 0.6× 515 1.2× 251 0.6× 123 0.6× 151 1.0× 50 994
Franziska Goer United States 13 521 0.7× 778 1.8× 208 0.5× 164 0.8× 123 0.8× 19 1.2k
Mitzy Kennis Netherlands 16 394 0.6× 471 1.1× 520 1.2× 100 0.5× 132 0.8× 27 1.3k
Shinpei Yoshimura Japan 20 506 0.7× 717 1.6× 232 0.6× 183 0.8× 261 1.7× 42 1.3k
Claudia Hägele Germany 13 367 0.5× 693 1.6× 265 0.6× 114 0.5× 369 2.3× 19 1.2k
Katharina Dohm Germany 18 394 0.6× 600 1.4× 313 0.8× 205 0.9× 358 2.3× 34 1.3k
A. Michael United Kingdom 10 608 0.9× 694 1.6× 401 1.0× 186 0.9× 711 4.5× 12 1.7k
Ignacio Martínez‐Zalacaín Spain 21 291 0.4× 494 1.1× 451 1.1× 82 0.4× 168 1.1× 61 984
Tracy Waldeck United States 10 237 0.3× 361 0.8× 268 0.6× 255 1.2× 183 1.2× 10 994
Sunny J. Dutra United States 16 282 0.4× 323 0.7× 252 0.6× 89 0.4× 192 1.2× 26 891

Countries citing papers authored by Herbert Steiner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Herbert Steiner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Herbert Steiner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Herbert Steiner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Herbert Steiner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Herbert Steiner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Herbert Steiner. The network helps show where Herbert Steiner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Herbert Steiner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Herbert Steiner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Herbert Steiner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Herbert Steiner. Herbert Steiner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Sankar, Anjali, et al.. (2014). Neural effects of cognitive–behavioural therapy on dysfunctional attitudes in depression. Psychological Medicine. 45(7). 1425–1433. 29 indexed citations
2.
Fu, Cynthia H.Y., Herbert Steiner, & Sergi G. Costafreda. (2012). Predictive neural biomarkers of clinical response in depression: A meta-analysis of functional and structural neuroimaging studies of pharmacological and psychological therapies. Neurobiology of Disease. 52. 75–83. 234 indexed citations
3.
Watkins, Edward, Eugene Mullan, Janet Wingrove, et al.. (2011). Rumination-focused cognitive–behavioural therapy for residual depression: phase II randomised controlled trial. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 199(4). 317–322. 291 indexed citations
4.
Fu, Cynthia H.Y., Steven Williams, Anthony J. Cleare, et al.. (2008). Neural Responses to Sad Facial Expressions in Major Depression Following Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. Biological Psychiatry. 64(6). 505–512. 246 indexed citations
5.
Mitterschiffthaler, Martina, Steven Williams, N. Walsh, et al.. (2008). Functional imaging of neural responses to emotional interference before and after cognitive behavioural therapy in major depression. European Psychiatry. 23. S190–S190. 1 indexed citations
6.
Watkins, Edward, Jan Scott, Janet Wingrove, et al.. (2007). Rumination-focused cognitive behaviour therapy for residual depression: A case series. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 45(9). 2144–2154. 258 indexed citations
8.
Woermann, Friedrich G., et al.. (2001). A fast FLAIR dual‐echo technique for hippocampal T2 relaxometry: First experiences in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 13(4). 547–552. 29 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026